Posted by Satu Rajaniemi on July 07, 19103 at 09:25:59:

The Saga of Jan MYRDAL ; "Second Target is China&North Korea and LENIN&Mao ZEDUNG's institutions by the side of Anti-Imperialist Muslims!"...


** - What are you
thinking about the China&North Korea Syndrome? - I should ask same
question... Is it meltdown in the movement ? - The "New World Order " has
"Neo-Sponsors" and those need "Neo-Actors".. for instance against a Independent
China... - Against all the independent institutions like the
provocations against China friends in SvekJa Kingdom and Australia... -
I have any observations on such matters... - Explain, please! -
When tens of thousands converged on Seattle last November to protest the
unrestrained corporate power reflected in the World Trade Organization, they had
little idea that forces were at work to hijack their new movement. We were in
Seattle to protest transnational corporations, including Nike, The Gap,
McDonalds, Starbucks and all the others, and the oppressive economic order they
have set up which is becoming commonly known as neoliberal globalism. To borrow
an analogy from the war on drugs, in our economy the corporations are the
pushers and the workers and their governments in developing countries are the
users, greedy for an income they can wrest from the wealthy and the powerful. In
Seattle, we went after the pushers. Yet only four months after Seattle, a
powerful effort is underway to shift the focus away from corporate power to a
chauvinistic attack on the Peoples Republic of China. Instead of a democratic
discussion and debate within the new movement, a few officials of the AFL-CIO
and some non-governmental organizations (NGOs) decided on their own to subvert
the growing internationalist movement with a China-bashing litany of accusations
of human rights violations and sweatshop conditions that just as easily could
have been laid against many of the 131 countries in the WTO.
- Not even the United States has clean hands. It has one-quarter of all the
world's prisoners, a rapidly growing body-count from state-sponsored executions,
by far the largest military in the world, seemingly constant murders and
frame-ups of African-Americans and Latinos by police officers, hundreds of
thousands of homeless, millions without health care and one of the worst income
distributions in the world. Critics of China would do well also to look to their
own backyard.
- Why is the AFL-CIO attacking China&North Korea?
- The motivation of the AFL-CIO leaders to attack China is two-fold. Many union
leaders have pandered to protectionist sentiments of their members instead of
educating them on the need for international solidarity against corporate rule.
With a few notable exceptions, most union and federation leaders do not base
their policies and actions on furthering class solidarity but instead follow the
path of least resistance with short-term goals that qualify them for dubious
distinction as "special interests." This failure of leadership not only makes
blaming China palatable but is opening the door to demagogues like Patrick
Buchanan and his "fortress American" siren song with its anti-immigrant
hysteria. Their second motivation for moving the fight against China to the top
of the agenda is ideological. In 1995, John Sweeney and his "New Voices" slate
replaced Lane Kirkland, Tom Donahue and a dynasty that could trace its roots
back 100 years to Sam Gompers. Sweeney vowed to shake up the federation's
international department which for years had worked hand-in-glove with the U.S.
State Department and the "Big Brother" in fighting the cold war.
- In fact, Sweeney did eliminate most of the cold warriors and changed the name
of the international operation to the Solidarity Center. But there was one
important exception - the Asia desk. It is from here, under the direction of
Kirkland holdover, Mark Hankin, that the barrage of anti-China propaganda
emanates. The unreconstructed cold warriors of the Asia desk enthusiastically
promote China dissidents in cooperation with the National Endowment for
Democracy (NED), the Hoover Institute, the "Big Brother" or a combination of
all of them.
- Strange Bedfellows !...
- Yes, it's!.. The fight against granting China permanent most favored nation
status and entry into the WTO has created strange bedfellows. When Chiang
Kai-shek and the Nationalist Chinese were driven out of mainland China in 1949
by the Peoples Liberation Army, the cry "Who lost China?" went up in right-wing
circles in the U.S. A rabidly anti-union wing of the Republican Party led by
Senators Robert Taft and Joe McCarthy led the hue and cry which didn't abate
until after two bloody wars on China's borders - Korea and Vietnam. Meanwhile,
they passed the Taft-Hartley Act which still hobbles labor 50 years later.
- Notwithstanding the new labor-far right alliance against China, liberal
opponents of the Chinese would argue that its bad human-rights record speaks for
itself. However, this argument breaks down when China is compared to other
developing countries, such as, Indonesia, Thailand, Burma, Malaysia, Pakistan,
Bangladesh, and other countries of Asia and the Middle East.
- In addition, some would argue that China is still based on a socialist model
and should not be evaluated only on criteria derived from advanced capitalist
societies. For example, it could be argued that in China the multiplicity of
local organizations and societies is more profoundly democratic than the
two-party political system in the U.S. In addition, an argument could be made
that economic rights, such as housing, health care and education are more
respected in China than in the U.S. The relative value of these competing
paradigms is largely in the eyes of the beholder.
- However, there can be no argument that with 100 million members, China has the
largest trade union organization in the world. The All China Confederation of
Trade Unions has approximately eight times as many members as does the AFL-CIO.
Yet, Sweeney and others refuse to deal with it on the grounds that it is part of
the state apparatus. The Chinese political structure is modeled on the pattern
developed after 1917 revolution in Russia where the Communist Party, the
government, the labor movement and agrarian organizations are closely linked and
interconnected. Cuba, which is a WTO member, also has this structure.
- However, it is not just in Communist countries that such a structure is found.
The South African labor movement proudly proclaims its alliance with the
Communist Party and the African National Congress on its
websiteAfrica next? Not likely. Just south of the border, Mexico has "enjoyed" a
similar system since 1910. The labor movement, the CTM, and the ruling party,
the PRI, are like two peas in a pod, yet no sanctions are demanded against
Mexico.
- Even the AFL-CIO is not immune from charges of governmental coziness. Lane
Kirkland graduated from the State Department to become George Meany's understudy
and successor (see "The Last Cold Warrior," Z Magazine, July 1995). As AFL-CIO
President, Kirkland did the bidding of his former State Department - and some
say, CIA - colleagues for many years. It's taken a long time for the federation
to live down its nickname, AFL-CIA.
- If Nixon could go to China, why not Sweeney ?!
- I understand!... More than 30 years after Richard Nixon went to China to meet
his arch-enemy, Mao Zedong and more than two years after Pope John Paul II met
with Fidel Castro, John Sweeney has yet to meet with his opposite number in the
All China Confederation of Trade Unions, or even visit a union hall in Shanghai.
Perhaps he will find Chinese trade unionists to be poor representatives of
workers' rights, in spite of the strong labor laws in the dominate public
sector. But at least it would be worth the trip before continuing with the
jingoistic campaign against China.
- We would do better to work for U.S. withdrawal from the WTO than to fight
China's admission. One more country, even one as large as China, will not change
the basic nature of the WTO. It is a tool of the rich and powerful and should be
dismantled.
- In the final analysis, those who would turn our newly emerging movement into
an anti-China campaign are doing a disservice to workers and consumers in this
country. At the very moment when the first mass movement since Vietnam is being
born, any deviation from its focus on corporate power and their international
bodies, including the WTO, the IMF and World Bank, can be deadly. It can lead to
demoralization and confusion about who is the real enemy of the vast majority of
people in the U.S. and around the world.
- We must recognize that China is the most populous - and potentially most
powerful - country in the world. More than a billion Chinese want a decent
standard of living within their lifetimes. Instead of playing into the hands of
the right wing and the military we should welcome their participation in a world
based on mutual respect and non-interference in each other affairs. We are all
blessed or doomed to live together on this planet. How we interact with China
and other emerging nations will determine if the world can avoid a fatal "melt
down" in which we destroy each other and the environment.
- What is about European Union, when you talk on such subjects there?
- Unfortunately, E.U. is UNDER ZIONIST CONSPIRACY; any chosen Democratical E.U.
Institutes targeted...
- I heard before...
- Crisis; EU confrontation The ZioniFascio Mafia / Provocation/corruption...
- Yes, it's! What does it mean, Sir?
- Financial Criminal Lobbies&dirty affairs & collaborators...
- It is strange!
- I always wonder WHY THERE IS NO ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF from any person of
IMMIGRANT GROUPS in SCANDINAVIA, but only Cleaner and Kebab Catch Boys etc.
slaves?All the honorable immigrantes been sistematically discriminated
specially the persons originated from Middle East.. Is it a tradition?
- I would like to say it is fascsitsoicalk influence of lobby groups...
- What should you call this modell? But why the members of Neo-Zionist Lobby
been accepted as "Fit to every works/everywhere" in
E.U.?
- What is the reason; you know?!
- Yes; many immigrants too been awakened and this generation is not
foolish...
for instance:
Nedim Dagdeviren isn't writer but it is a only show to play like a
"Librarian" although he never been at library faculty... Bur Sweden is
the
Second Israel of Europe and the lobbies are very glad with Nedim's
spionage-duties against the Immigrants... For example he translated the
archive/Kurdish-Turkish documents of STASI (DDR)... Turkish Communist
Party
went to Turkey back in 1989 and becouse of the members of TKP couldn't
any
word in Kurdish; they left many material in DDR and sold only the
Turkish
archive to Holland... After Berlin Wall-collaps the West transported
the
Kurdish materials, too. Sweden had already cooperation before
E.U.-membership and Nedim's group began to go often to the BRD but
Sweden
had a little problem with bureucratial areas until membership to the
E.U. ,
at least Sweden been accepted a real member to E.U. in January 1995 and
Europol solved the bureucratical details too. Nedim began play much
more
between the member countries... (But it is interesting he started many
Friend Clubs too like Mezopotamya Förlagsstödförening, Israels kurdiska
vaennner, Socialdemocrat kandidatens Huddinge stödlobbyn etc. and he
wrote
provocative articles in Dagens Nyheter daily newspapers Kulturbilagan
column
instead of Arne Ruth when this chief -judeinsamlingens chief- was at
hospital, by this way he locked the political immigrants too and
spioned
just them by SÄPO)...
**
- Invandrarverket (it changed the name to Migrationsverket) had
many
agents
from SÄPO . This is the Swedish secret spionage organization who never
accepts a member from Middle East originated and Turcs/Kurds counts as
Arabs
in their papers... and many staff of SÄPO is from Judaic families who
were
the rich Jews, thieves, anti-democratic collaborators, etc. after the
World
War settled in Scandinavia and this lobby recommended that Nedim's
group can
go to the formerly Soviet countries too for specially duty in
Armenia...
Nedim agreed with them on all the subjects and did what they want...
and
they respected only Nedim's group not the other one from Krds/Turcs...
Armenia is been informed that this group transferred many material from
East
to the West... but nobody interested in the archives which connected
to
the minorities... Frankly Armenia was glad with this cooperation
because
both sides wouldn't any problem with the Kurd minority in Armenia...
Meanwhile Kurds had deeply problem both in North Iraq and South of
Turkey...
E.U. guaranted that would no such problem and they worked all together
against the minorities. (Meanwhile E.U started the Conference Series in
The
ABF Organization, subjects were the Rights of Minorities-what double
moral).......
**
- Nedim Dagdeviren's group succeed stolen the archives of Armenian/Kurds
and
top secret Kurdish documents of Soviet countries. Nobody of Nedim's
group
took the way from Istanbul because meanwhile a person been accused only
for
a book in Istanbul. (Aysegül Tecimer, who had only one ancient book, in
meantime Nedim transported several ancient books from Armenia, Sochi,
Moscow, Tallinn...). USrael recommended him to the coordination
committe of
(so called Interpretation Committe) to the Balkan conflict area, too.
....
and therefore he went several times to Crotia-Tel Aviv-Yerevan... He
had
therefore any other "accessuars" for instance, VIP cards of Swedish
PEN.
Swedish PEN is a real MOSSAD secretary, clerk section, specially the HQ
in
Sweden.. When for example, China put veto for the West in United Nations,
Swedish PEN started a sign-petition campaigne against China and
Philosopher
Jan Myrdall went to court against Nedim Group's provocative works...
**
- Mr. Dagdeviren recomended that both TURCS and KURDS/ASSYRIANS HAVE VERY
BADLY-VERY NEGATIVE CHARACTER POINTS to be staff at official sections
and
therefore THERE IS NO ONE TURC-NO ONE KURD-NOONE ASSYRIAN ALREADY in
The
ADMINISTRATION AREAS in SCANDINAVIA and THEREFORE KURDS/TURCS CAN BE
ONLY
"CLEANER STAFF" in the NORTH EUROPA...
There is principal rules and it is fit to the Scandinavian tradition,
too.
But N. Dagdeviren is been choosen to the Writer's Foundation of Culture
Ministry until 2003. This is recommendation of SÄPO and MOSSAD.
http://www.pressi.com/fi/release/12562.html
This "job" is a present, such a gift to him because he does his duty
"succesful" by the Migrations Office of Norrköping, too.
After 1995 (just Sweden been member of E.U.) many Iraqi Kurds tried to
go
the Scandinavian countries over the Baltics. When they leave the
countries
Lethonia, Estonia, Lithuania etc. they explained that whole people gone
over
BRD, Denmark, Netherlands or England... They had no any pass or
identities...
- Yes, it's!.. Nedim DAGDEVIREN worked at offices Norrköping as
tolk/(interpreter) and
teacher... When his group couldn't spionage the adults he tried to tape
the
versions of children in the Kindergarten's/Primary schoools' directory
rooms. He could for example WHO IS ZAZA, WHO IS FAILI KURD and WHO CAN
KURMANCI, WHO CAN NOT... %90 Percent of the refugees been sent back to
the
Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine and Israel catched many wanted persons
there...
Israel was very glad on this gorup's duty...
Many people dead in Baltic Sea's cold water... Many youngs chosen
suicide...
Bur Norway, Danemark, Finland and Sweden recommended to give "gift
money"
to the group of N.D.
N. D. afraid of if anybody struggle against his groups work ...
Säpo guaranteed that Turcs/Kurds should go only to the "cleaning
courses"
when they have permittance and go to Job Offices (Arbetsförmedlingen).
Meanwhile ND sold the "Civil Ingenieur Diploms" to the Iraqi Kurds who
been
member of Neo-Zion organizations...
Any important details: 1- Mr. N D is not a staff from any country from
Middle East but he is guilty in Turkey for 10 years and wanted by the
police
both Syria, Iraq... Turkey or any neighbour countries don't accept use
such
"dirty characters" as staff. Of course, Mafia has hand in Turkey too;
but
majority in Turkey has respect to the democratic constitution, legal
rules
and enthusiasm to be clear and modern country. But Scandinavian
countries
have a tradition to cooperate with the "traitorous characters", spion
immigrants since the two WWs ; specially Sweden and Finland always
cooperated with anti-democrats, collaborator Jews against the
democratic
movements and therefore Sweden calls today as "democratic Fascist
modell"...
2- Secondly: Nedim's group has only one rule: Money... Althoug they
accepted
to be Neo-Zion members, their God is only Money, their half-official
Mafia
chiefs are the Jesus or Mohammad. This group has no special aim for
instance
many people accuse them that they work against the Kurds... It is
wrong:
NEDIM WORKS AGAINST HUMAN BEING for only a handful dollars... It is not
important that anybody comes from Armenia or Palestine or Syria, Iraq,
Iran...
3- But it is very dangerous effect that North Eyropean COUNTRIES
ACCEPTS
both the TURCS and KURDS/ASSYRIANS only as "CLEANER STAFF" never and
never
as "ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF" because of such groups "traitorous effort
against
immigrants"... Since many years works Nedim's group at Norrköping's
Migrations/Integration administration and saying "Immigrants are
lying" and
they find on the %90 case that many people lies in life. For instance a
man
who come from Bolu and had couisine from Yunak and registrated as his
real-child... Nedim declared him because of Yunak is not the province
of
Bolu but Yunak is the near of Konya and man deported back to Turkey who
must
pay back the Barndidrag" (means child money) etc.
- I have additional info, a news published on October 9, 2001... Nedim
DAGDEVÍREN and other any members of
Swedish/Jews Lobby went to BRD and this group will join the PEN Group
in
Frankfurt Book Fair (Buchmesse, between 10 - 15 October 2001) and they
will
play the roles as writers/publishers/library staff (!)... and his group
is
publishing Yedidut (fanatic Judaic Propagand) broshures there...
**
Who has evidence about such dirty affairs, please and
please, go
to the courts and democratic authorities of Turkey, Sweden or directly
to
the E.U. and explain what you have as testimonies... Explain please who
and
how people been forced to pay moneý to the Groups or members of N. D.;
who
been deported injustice, who died in the cold sea of Baltics, who been
opressed or forced been jobless... Inform for example the responsible
persons like: Hans.Anell@culture.ministry.se,
statens.kulturrad@kur.se,
margareta.wikstrom@kur.se, exhibition@book-fair.com,
visitor@book-fair.com, press@book-fair.com, info@book-fair.com,
online@book-fair.com, centre@book-fair.com,
migrationsverket@migrationsverket.se, ots@udi.no,
integrationsverket@integrationsverket.se,
henrik.emilsson@integrationsverket, migrant@immi.se, ikis@immi.se,
emil.persson@flamman.se, webmaster@primeminister.ministry.se,
redaktionen@arbetarbladet.se,
And the relatives who living already in the E.U. countries, please
inform
all the persons, specially the immigrants that N. D. stolen their
person
numbers from Migrationverket's Offices and plays with their "CODE"
indications... Nedim DAGDEVÍREN was staff at Migratinosverket as Tolk
(Interpreter) and registrated many many people that like a "PERSONA NON
GRATA" who comes to Europe for economical aims and will not serious
work,
try to have only SOCIAL HILFE (SOCIAL BIDRAG) etc. Everyone/Immigrants
and
their relatives are POTENTIALLY SUSPICIOUS by STATE because registrated
as
Potential Danger... Very very dangerous bacause every immigrant has
such
Code tables at Migrationsverket and when anybody changed it, this
person can
never find job/never can be accepted as STAFF by STATE, even
recommendation
to be "Cleaner/catch boy"!!!
**
- Here is the detailed page on Nedim's shame for example provocation
against
China during Balkan Conflict, China chosed weto by United Nations:
http://www.fib.se/skrft699.html
**
- For further information, please visit the Sources of discussion forums:

Olympic notices:
http://www.ussailing.org/olympics/2000/notes_of_support.htm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eIntifada/messages

www.merip.org/
Al-awda@egroups.com
Info@rightofreturn.org
www.badil.org
www.PalestineCenter.org
www.abunimah.org
www.adc.org/adc
www.ozgurpolitika.org/
http://www.webcom.com/maxang/ASAN_BBS/Read/11.html
www.tari.org
www.alternative-info.nu
www.IntifadaOnline.com/
www.amnesty.org/news/1996/51504996.htm
http://www.institutkurde.org/
http://search.lycos.com/main/?query=Neo+Zion+Nedim+Dagdeviren&loc=fromlycosmain&rd=y
http://liberate-palestine.hypermart.net/
http://www.labournet.co.uk/community/forum/messages/224.html
CAMPAIGN against ARM TRADE:
http://www.caat.org.uk/
http://burn.ucsd.edu/archives/kurd-l/1999.03/msg00005.html
Solidarity groups forum/International Revolutionary Immigrants in the
E.U.:
www.bkp.org/
www.Kurdinfo.com
- Are there any money transferring evidence sites (open corruption of Z.O.G. on
Internet)?
- Many... Here is an example:
http://www.friends-partners.org/friends/sponsors/index.html(opt,mozilla,pc,english,,new)
http://www.framtidenskultur.se/redov95/95_855.htm
http://www.fib.se/skrft699.html
- This is the right name; FINANCIAL
TERROR
LOBBIES, been declared by Kurdinfo sympathizers

- Why the Fascist Collaboration market organized provacations against the China
authorities and China Friends?..
- Remember these news: "Rojev reported; CRIMINAL FOUNDATIONS CORRUPTED THE
CRIMINALS WHO ATTACKED THE CHINA AUTHORITIES, ANTI-ZIONIST INTELLECTUALS,
BUREAUCRATS etc..." Any lobbies support these groups for example a famous
Scandinavian
foundation uses a lot of criminal immigrants against the
scientists/authors/artists....
http://www.fib.se/skrft699.html
**
- Because of China put veto on Balkan questions in the sessions of United
Nations, any groups been mobilized again for start a serie provocations; for
instance, Neo-Zion Nedim DAGDEVIREN and any other enemies of human being
prepared a lie-list to provoce the PEN-administration.
Corrupted PEN-members and any other provocators signed a lie list against China.
Nedim's group created conflicts which included any dirty names against Mr. Jan
MYRDAL&Mrs. Gun KESSLE... Scandinavians most dangereous traritorous characters,
for instance, Per AHLMARK, Nawid AKHGAR, Mina SAADÍ, Ulf BOËTHIUS, Hedi FRIED,
Fabriela MALINESCU, Jan Henrik SWAHN, Hillevi GANTEZ, Eva RUNEFELT, Anita
THEORELL, Jackie JACUBOWSKI, Maciej ZAREMBA, Marie-Hélène BOCCARA, Ana L. VALDES
etc. all the relatives of Fascist Jews bastards' mobilized to play its roles...
In fact: China put veto on U.S.A. suggestions and this corruption is only a
"Revenge" against the E.U.-democrats who supported the Anti-Imperialist
Peoples...
When the enemies of China need a agent-provocatör in Scandinavia; Mr. DAGDEVIREN
is always stand... These fanatics run hand-in-hand with Neo-Zion
Chief DAGDEVIREN Fascist Zionist Dagdeviren offered himself like a "candidate
number one, ready doing everything "only for a handful dirty dollars, when the
enemies of China announced a serie attacks against the famous authors Jan
MYRDAL&Gun KESSLE. Enemies of China are giving money to the Fascist sect "Falun
Gang" and the Anti-Cuban Miami-Mafia, similarly traitorous groups, because of
"the coup in the heart of PEN" aims struggle against all the Maoist / Marxist /
Leninist (shortly says, Anti-Imperialist) intellectuals, institutes,
authorities etc. This is a neo-trend by neo-Zion traditional Fascism, also
corrupting the authorities against the independent offices and individuals,
specially in the E.U. members nowadays...
Neo-Zion Fascio Chief Nedim accepted to organize en attack against Jan MYRDAL
and Gun KESSLE on 2nd March 1997.. Here is the various evidence sites,
additional detail pages about the shame of PEN and the shame of Scandinavian
regimes', institutions etc.:
http://www.fib.se/skrft699.html
**
- In the year 1995 Sweden was been full member by E.U. and the lobbies had much
more possibilities to build any provocative centers for example the IDEA
bureaus for propagand of NATO membership and ground many bridges to provocate
the NGOs, minorities, institutions and neighbour countries like Baltics
communities. The members of "Bridge-lobbies" like tehe Baltics -Moscow
coordinators have strongly money-transferring support for example; Natasha
BULASHOVA (Puschino Biological Center), Tanya STEPANOVA, Evgeny MIKOVSKY,
Tatiana PROVOROVA, Ivan REVYAKIN, Zhenya KOZLOVA, Lera GONCHUKOVA and all these
Russian whores Chief is an American from Knoville-Tennessee, Greg COLE;
frnds@solar.rtd.utk.edu , Natasha worked in the brothels only 10 US dollars
when she was in Tel Aviv /Istanbul-Laleli, but now she is swimming in the
money ocean. Theyse examples are enough to explain many things and the
neo-zion lobbies have no more any denial; the neo-zion lobbies are doing
exactly the opposite and explain the dirty financial connections on the own
Homapages; read and search please,
http://www.friends-partners.org/ and
http://www.idea.int/ and
http://www.framtidenskultur.se/redov95/95_855.htm
and Baltics Internet Monopolies like
http://www.marebalticum.se/kurd/001.htm and false libraries like
http://www.marebalticum.se/kurd/index.htm
and prised writers (!!!) who actually have no talence to write a page;
http://tema1.sskkii.gu.se/docs/immi/writer.htm
and all the Jewish propagand collaborators, FM radios all over the World shared
the corruption benefits, millions of U.S.-dollars in the same time from the same
NATO -chiefs and same Jew authorities. And their staff have never been
"Jobbless" nor declared looking for suitable job. Never! Even their family
members counts like "the chosen people of" Imperialism!
Australian Zionstis have a freak-magazine, The Review is the monthly
propagand-magazine of Australian-Jew lobbies... It is formerly Australia/Israel
Review, when Swedish MoSSad changed its name as IsroSweden Info Bureau,
Australian Jew provocators too decided to change its name aimed to create a new
image... After 1998 began to publish as electronic-magazine on internet...
E-mail: aijac@aijac.org.au Phone: +61 3 9529 5022; Fax: +61 3 9529 8571;
Sydney Office Phone: +61 2 9360 5415
Kurdish Coordinators in Australia are Neo-Zion traitors Mr. Simko (formerly code
name: Haval) and Mr. Dasko Seyan. E-post: haval10@hotmail.com
**
- Money laundry chiefs of Neo-Zion gang members are Nedim DAGDEVIREN and his
tellers Mehmet Tayfun, Cheko Pekgül. This lat one, Neo-Member PEKGÜL is a
dangerous mole in the
Swedo Sosis' Democrats Party=Ledamot i Skattenämnd Lokal, Spånga /Tensta
/Stockholm and here is the Post-Address of Neo-Zion Agent Mr. Cheko PEKGÜL:
Husingeplan 10, 2tr
163 63 SPÅNGA / STOCKHOLM / SCANDINAVIA
**
Is this bloody money and CORRUPTION the last one of the biggest "open" WEAPON
of ZIONIST FASCISM???
**
- Hypocrite is the candidate for elections - 2002... It is available to read
the shame and corruption at her own declarations (gang-friends published it
actually in Swedish language, although she never learned any language but
Kurdish):

** - FM Channel broadcasting in Svekish language
that; "Novin HARSAN är en typisk parasit som får sin del av skiten d.v.s. visas
som låtsas anställd och får fullkomliga förmåner, inkomster som ersättare i
Stockholm läns landsting:
http://www.sll.se/forum/w_forum.cse?q=q&plus=unfold Sidan
avslöjar hur detta skurkvänliga systemet föder skurkaktiga knähunden... Hon får
allt vad hon inte aldrig borde ha... Skurkenshemadress:Holbergsgatan 138
168 45 BROMMA-STOCKHOLM Telefon mobil:
070-4154938 Telefon hem: 00.46.8.874814
E-post: novin.harsan@chello.se
Officiella forum page: http://www.sll.se/kontakt/w_mailform.cse?PersonId=6658

- It is ended number '58 but frankly she borned in 1958...
- I know!.. Novin HARSAN is not alone on this duty... Her close Syrian Kurds
explain to the Swedish authorities, I had a copy; here; "Lapdog Harsan är inte
ensam i skurkensvärld, exempelvis organiseras sådana varelser i forna Soviet
Union-areal också avslölas att alla dessa korrumperas av
imperialistiskakapitalet:

"Money laundry" syns även å deras egna Internet trafficking; t.ex.en legaliserad
bit av Moscow och Uppsala kassa-räkningar", means:, it is a fact about the Money
transferring evidence sites (open corruption of The Zionist Occupational Mafia
on Internet):
http://www.friends-partners.org/friends/sponsors/index.html(opt,mozilla,pc,english,,new)
http://www.framtidenskultur.se/redov95/95_855.htm

**
- There are much more interesting information, if you visit the all other
related sources, links, sites and discussion forums, there many authorities
discuss on above subjects so-caled the "Open Revenge" between E.U.'s
democratical institutions and the "corruptialo-assassini" Zionist
lobbies..
- Yes, it's!.. We should send aour special thanks to the voluntary
interpreters/translators of UNITY and EU fot the people :

- Thus Top Secret page of the Concept "Crisis; EU confrontation The ZioniFascist
Occupational Gang / corruption /conflict coverage", has been
declared by Kurdinfo sympathizers
- What does it mean?
- It's a real CONFRONTATION between Zionist Imperialism and any democratical
Intitutions of European Union - full coverage
- I wonder why many Laponians asking so many questions... Although I see no
relation between Syria, China and laponia...
- "He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a
fool forever."
- Said Jan Myrdal?!
- ...him too! Frankly, it is a Chinese proverb.
- ?!

**
- In several countries, on the contrary, revisionism is the speciality not of
the racist and anti-Semite extreme right, but it is not true... There are the
several groups of individuals coming from the left. This is the case in Sweden
following the intervention on Robert Faurisson's behalf of the left-wing
sociologist Jan Myrdal, whose intervention was on behalf not merely of the man
but, in part, of his ideas; in Australia, following the action of the former
secretary of the Victorian Council for Civil Liberties, John Bennett; and even
in Italy, where a small Marxist libertarian group invokes its debt to Paul
Rassinier.

**

- I think the reason is not only China&North Korea!
- Are there any other confrontations bteween EU and USrael?
- Yes!... Jan Myrdal is one of the Swedish Professors Defend Revisionism on
Trial
- Explain please!..
- What is the driving conviction behind holocaust revisionism? One answer might
be that historical truths cannot be decided in or by the courts, for ultimately
there can be no historical scholarship without freedom of research and
expression. Yet, up to now the Holocaust propagandists have used the courts on a
broad scale to becloud this simple, basic truth. Note the words up to now, for
recently Jan Hjaerpe and Jan Bergmann, two professors in Sweden, have confronted
a court of judges in their country on this issue, in connection with the trial
of Ahmed Rami in Stockholm.

- Who is Ahmed Rami and what was the Rami trial?

- Rami, a freedom fighter refugee in SvekJa Kingdom for some years, is a Berber
by birth and a former Moroccan army officer. Highly gifted and vocal, he
passionately espouses the cause of the Palestinian people, most of whom are his
fellow Muslims. Author of five books in Swedish, in 1987 he founded and directed
Radio Islam, broadcasting to Swedes and the some 80,000 Muslims living in
SvekJa. He also used his broadcasting to inform his listeners about Revisionism,
in particular the work of Dr. Robert Faurisson and the "Holocaust Trial" of
Ernst Zündel in Toronto, Canada. Like Faurisson, Rami links the Holocaust to the
plight of the Palestinians. For, besides the German people, but not its leaders,
Faurisson sees the Palestinians, dispossessed of their homeland by the Zionists,
as victims of the Holocaust propaganda.

For Rami, who has made it a point to interview noted Swedes, Holocaust
Revisionism is more than a passive intellectual, historical pursuit. It is
instead an active, first, necessary ideological step in the liberation of the
Palestinian people. Accordingly, as long as the Holocaust remains unchallenged
historically in the Western world, so long will it victimize the Palestinians.
Rami recalls a quote attributed to Charles de Gaulle, who at the end of World
War II claimed that for the Palestinians, World War II was merely a battle in an
ongoing war. In this light, then, the intifada is really a continuation of World
War II.

For such outspokenness, Rami's Islam Radio was legally closed, and Rami was
brought before a Swedish court on September 5, 1989 in a trial that lasted until
November of that year. Rami was convicted and sentenced to a six-month term for
violating his radio license, and for broadcasting

anti-Semitism and hatred. Some claim, perhaps presumptuously, that the widely
publicized international anti-hate convention in Oslo, at the end of August and
the beginning of September 1990, attended by some 500 persons from all over the
world, was organized by Elie Wiesel and others expressly to sustain an
international campaign against Rami's small one-room radio station in Stockholm.
To be sure, at this time Rami's case was being appealed.

Since SvekJa was neutral in both world wars, it may well be more open to
Revisionism than other European countries. There are no world war veterans'
organizations, let alone groups of former resistants to German occupation as in
France, Norway and Denmark. Thus it is less surprising that precisely in Sweden
there has developed a confrontation between the university, with its traditional
freedom from research and publication, and the courts, which may use their power
to curb this freedom.

Professor Jan Hjaerpe of the University of Lund exemplified this confrontation
in his testimony for Rami. Professor Hjaerpe testified that, in his opinion,
Rami had contributed to a better understanding regarding Israel and Judaism in
the debate over the Palestinian issue. The professor told the judge that a court
is not competent to decide in debates on pollitical, historical and ideological
issues. He stressed as well that treating the Holocaust as an area for
historical study entails that such study be opened to the freedom of critical
research, including doubt and denial. Furthermore, if one hinders the right to
deny (this includes also the Establishment version of World War II), then one
transforms Exterminationism into a religious dogma, i.e. a matter based on faith
and not reason.

According to this argument, since Zionists have used the Holocaust as part of
their historical and political claim to the legitimacy of the State of Israel,
as a result seriously encroaching on the rights of the Palestinians, these,
then, have a right to discuss, debate and closely examine the case for and
against the Holocaust.

Professor Jan Bergmann, of the theological faculty in Uppsala, also defended
Rami in court, depite a bitter press campaign waged against this scholar of
ancient oriental and comparative religions. Professor Bergmann was asked his
scholarly opinion as to whether Rami's claims regarding certain texts in the Old
Testament (as it is called by non-Jews) and the Talmud were historically
correct, since these texts allegedly claim that the Jews have a right to
Palestine even at the expense of its long-time inhabitants. (And this without
clear geographical borders!) Bergmann agreed with Rami's interpretation. More
explicitly the theologian testified that the sacred texts of the Old Testament
and the Talmud, cited by Rami, are indeed being used today as political and
historical claims by Israel and the Zionists for exploiting and legitimatizing
the Jewish occupation of Palestine. (Some call these the "cruel" texts of the
Bible. Christians see these texts through the light of the New Testament.)

Although this testimony was not revisionist as such, the Jewish publication
Judish Kroenika (April, 1989) claimed that Professor Bergmann is a Holocaust
Revisionist. Allegedly, in a conversation during an airplane flight from Israel,
the professor expressed doubt that some 6,000,000 Jews perished in World War II,
and that the actual number was rapidly expanded after the war by Jewish
organizations to create a more favorable climate for the establishment of
Israel. The same publication also accused the professor of seeing in Robert
Faurisson's Is the Diary of Anne Frank Genuine? serious research, thereby
implying doubt as to the authenticity of the Diary.

Unlike these two professors, Krister Stendahl, the retired bishop of Stockholm,
now a honorary professor at Harvard University, was flown in from the U.S. to
testify against Rami. Professor Stendahl testified that the Jews alone have the
right to interpret their Old Testament, upon which Rami questioned whether that
right also included the right to drive out and exterminate the Palestinian
people. Stendahl, a Lutheran, claimed that Luther's writing The Jews and Their
Lies was un-Christian and that Luther was an anti-Semite. According to an
article by Rami, the former bishop has advocated the return of Christians to the
religion of their origin, that is, Judaism. Further, Professor Stendahl accepts
the Zionist definition of Zionism: the national liberation movement for the
Jewish people.

Rami in his writings makes little or no distinction between Zionism and Judaism,
insisting that Zionism, in so far as the Palestinians are concerned, is the
logical expression of Judaism, both being grounded in the same interpretation
and understanding of the Old Testament and the Talmud. He sees therein an
eternal hate-filled tension, as Jews dislocate the Palestinians and attempt to
drive wedges among the Islamic nations, and a wedge between Christianity and
Islam.

In a public declaration in the name of academic freedom, the theological
professor in the University of Uppsala supported Professor Bergmann's academic
freedom. (That is, the freedom of the professor, in his area, to research a
topic and publish his findings, without jeopardizing his university standing.)

- Jan Myrdal's faul(!)...
- I am coming to this faul(!) point... At the same time, Rami and professors
Hjaerpe and Bergman have been supported in the Swedish press by Jan Myrdal, the
son of the late famous professor and Nobel Prize winner Gunner Myrdal (in an
article in Folket i Bild, a periodical published by an organization with the
same name).

These developments in SvekJa on the highest academic level, the university, give
revisionism reason for optimism, by supporting the position, of particular
importance to Revisionists in view of international legal efforts, that it is
the very nature of historical truths that these cannot be decided in or by
courts. Human History like life itself, are much, much more complicated than
that.

**
- But we see that Jan Myrdal is not alone, the intellectuals and many
independent scientits support him... What is the intellectual dilemma in SvekJa?
- The 'European Intellectual Dilemma' to borrow the title of the classic work
by Anne Frank originated lie fabricators which appeared during Cold War, is
still a dilemma and the true massacre cases like Palestinian Genocide put it
under the spotlight.
- Super Powers use "veto" weapon!
- But China?!
- Now I understand better why the lapdogs attacking to the non-corrupted
intellectuals!..

**
- Zionist leagues hired many collaborators... There are traitors, imported
figures.. But there are fanatical evangelists too, who working active in the
different communities...
- Like mole? Example?
- Yes, "mullvadan" says in SvekJa; example the fake Christ democrat, Annelie
Enochson...Listen, vad she do in parliament!..
- Uyghur Issue Brought up at Swedish Parliament Again
The Human Rights situation in China, specially the human rights violations
against Uyghurs was brought up at the Swedish Parliament again. Parliament
members lead by Annelie Enochson sent a letter to Chinese premier Zhu Rongji
on the human rights violations against Uyghurs and Rebiya Kadeer. The
following news was posted at the Swedish Parliament webpage. A Swedish friend
translated it into English/Turdi..
QUESTION 2000/ 01:1263 by Annelie Enochson (KD) to Foreign Minister Anna
Lindh about China and EU.
We are very pleased to recognise the dialogue the Foreign Minister and her
colleagues in EU have established with the leaders of China about human
rights in China. Because the situation of the most persecuted groups has
changed to the worse we will ask the Foreign Minister to intensify the
dialogue. The Uighur people in Western China are suffering under the
pressure from the last "Beat hard " campaign. One example is the Uighur
businesswoman Rebiya Kadeer, who still is imprisoned for having sent Chinese
newspapers to her husband who is living as a refugee abroad. She does not
get enough food and she is not allowed to keep food, clothes and spectacles
which her children want to give her. In China a prisoner is allowed to have
visits from his family once a month, but because Rebiya Kadeer has not been
able to do all her forced labour because she is not allowed to wear
spectacles, she is only allowed to meet her children every third month.
Members of different churches are suffering from prohibition and
persecution. When will China get religious freedom worth the name freedom?
During the 19th century Sweden had a law forbidding prayer and Bible studies
in the homes. But this law is abolished since 150 years and should be so
even in China now when China will be considered to be a modern country. It
is really good that the Foreign Minister emphasises this issue as
responsible Minister of EU. The just finished seminar in Beijing where death
penalty was discussed is a very good initiative. It is urgent that Sweden
keeps the dialogue with China going even after the first of July when
Swedenâ ™s presidency of EU is finished. I want to ask what the Foreign
Minister is going to do in order to continue the dialogue after this date.
ANSWER to question 2000/ 01: 1263 about China and EU Foreign Minister Anna
Lind:
Annelie Enochson has asked what I am going to do in order to continue the
dialogue with China even after the first of July 2001. When Sweden has the
presidency in EU it is Swedenâ ™s task to declare EUâ ™s views on the issue
human rights in China and push the demands of changes which EU´s foreign
ministers agreed to during their meetings on the 22nd of January and the
19th of March this year. Eu carries on an active dialogue about the human
rights with representatives from the government, parliament and research
institutions in China and this dialogue is to go on even under the following
presidency. Dialogue meetings on a high level as well as a seminar like that
organized in Beijing during Swedenâ ™s presidency will take place during the
Belgian presidency. The Swedish government looks very seriously at the lack
of respect for the human rights in China. Besides the dialogue in EU Sweden
will on a high level and at every opportunity talk about the human rights in
China and protest against violation of the human rights which we consider is
going on. This will take place in direct talks and contacts with the Chinese
government both bilaterally and in the dialogues between EU and China as
well as speeches in the UN and by Swedenâ ™s membership in UNâ ™s Commission of
Human Rights. EU will continuously estimate the dialogue and in China
measure the progress of positive results and even in this work Sweden will
take an active part.
- FM broadcasting from parliament?
- No.. This clip recorded by Uyghur-American organization, Swedish section...
- Incredible... SvekJa Kingdom uses like a condom for all kind of trafficking..
But I am a true Christian and I can not accept the provocations under religous
mask... I would like to ask.. Had this clan, Enochson mmbers sent a condemn
letter to the Usrael when the Jewish occupational Mafia massacre people?
- Impossible!.. Enochsons work for USrael...
- ?!

**
- What are you thinking on these incredible scenes? - We must know that
our weakness is Imperialism's strength, I understand here again... - I agree
with you, Comrade Jonas Hållén! - You are welcome, Comrade Lars Törnman!
**
- I think, democracy should work better!.. Criminals and collaborators should be
arrested!
- Should we arrest the criminals?!. Don't make me laugh! - Well, I see the
double roles and false rules of the juridical instruments... What a shame we
been forced to label it "democracy"... How thus majority of people, thus living
creators, stinky mass could be so incredible nonsense blind meanwhile all the
enormous fraudulent process?!.. Unbelieveable!... This is a glaring
injustice!.. I wonder, what goes wrong by the juridical instruments... How can I
say?! It is very strange!... You now, if you see all these incredible cases,
nonsense attitudes... - How? Do you explain? What is concrete that you
remember? - Yes, I remember that David Janzon, a redactional worker of Radio
Islam, was sentenced to 4 months' imprisonment in October 1992, for the
station's agitation "against an ethnic group". Are the provocators of Capitalist
Fascist lobbies are really a ethnical group?! - There is so specially
groups? Okay, Jews!... It's the overclass group, nobody can imitate such
shurks... - But when you been oppressed so your accusation can only
be refuseed... The shurks are the masters 'cause they experinced a lot of cruel
methodes since many years... You can only suffer like many freedom fighters...
- Concrete cases? - Very much!... The judges of system who play dirty
rolls... It is extra incredible on Swedish justice-scenes that many foolish
judges been corrupted by Jewish authorities and they play extra horrible rolls
as pycho-proff doctor magister at policlinics... I can not meet all the judges
nor observate all the cases but I met many high-staff at Golf Club Tenerrife,
they explained... Shamful!... I can not explain here what they say on the
corrpted colleges, so awfully shameful... ... Court material look likes
simetrical sences, reasons are too similarly... Many papers of court been
published by the Bonniers, Nordstedt... Same mechanism publish as basic Zionist
propagand material, too... EU-membership... After 1995 impressed it by the
democratical authorities of other countries? - Unfortunately, it's in all
frauds, much more dirty now... If any true jurist goes to United Nations related
commissions or the independent justice authorities, so we shall most interesting
scandals... - What kind of scandals? - For instance Osmo
Vallo&Tony Mutka and other members of the "assassination on the so called
Resande Folket" cases... Märta Pettersson and others who murdered by the
"imported criminals" like Bengalian Zionist Mafia moblized in the EU; similarly
recruitments cases... Remember; what the relatiives of Tony Deogan, Dagmar
Hagelin, Anders Gustavsson demand... - Don't make me worry with
examles, don't list please much more!.. - It's not me who create the
official shame lists!.. Did you hear Osmo Vallo's two brothers and all other
relatives are arrested, too... The victims and witness been arrested instead of
murderers... Otherway, many freedom fighters forced to be jobless and living
under minimal standards... Most famous concret case is Stefan Dimiter
Tcholakov who labelled as "laborious" and Work Rights fighters Jimmie
Östergren, delegated adviser (former grafiker) Bengt Pettersson and Ahmed Rami,
'cause of criticized the thieves by the Capitalist Jewish lobbies... Laponians
who fight for own mark and minority rights, therefore prisoned their
representative character Olof T. Johansson, the true Socialists like Bengt
Frejd, Sara Lidman, Staffan Ehnebom, so-called the "Free Speech Fighters",
anti-Capitalist demonstranter like Jan Hatto, Sten Arne-Zerpe, Dietlieb
Felderer, movements who struggle against the weapon-handlers like Henrik
Westander (before professur-chair gift) and by his side likely flexible Calle
Höglund, anti-Imperialists Hannes Westberg, Herman Schmid, journalists Staffan
Beckman, Stefan Hjertén, free-mind intellectuals like Rainer Holm, Linus
Brohult, honoured priest K. G. Hammar and hundreds of the anti-Imperialists who
been registrated by the lobbies... - What is common with them?
- Also! When a Fascist accuse them so judges punish the reviewers,
immediately... But when the oppressed people leave any accusation acceptance,
can easily be refuseed ... The requests of them almost been absolutely
refuseed... - Why the DN, Expressen and other big papers awoid of to
publich these true stories?.. They awoid of to show the real discrimination?!
Schindler's List was only a filmatic illusion, actually the true boss never gave
a chance peace in communities... You know, Bonniers, Wallenberg,
Bilderberg-gangs and "Bulldogs" drive the Swindlers' lists, means all the
honoured intellectuals been registrated on their computers... Therefore
Stockholm-Sydney changed to be second plot area of Jew York-Tel Aviv's armed
Mafia... - Yes, it's!.. But what a lucky I have been warned before!. -
The authorities are blind on such actions.. Why? - Because every big shurk
drives by the big lobbies in this big SvekJa zionized Kingdom... - ?!
- How can we could informed and know the truth!?... - I can't reply all in
two minutes?! - Well!... I understand better... It's a modernised
version of enormous hypocrisy... And I understand why the worlkd couldn't react
when Jews slaughed people in Sabra, Shatila, Jenin... Everybody watched on tv
meanwhile druck Coca-Cola, chips, bonbons... - Like the film-druged idiots?..
- No, Sir!... We have incredible reactions and collaborated feelings too,
remember, we all cried when we watched on the Swindler's list, whole lies
master-piece on scenes... - Shame on double-moral masters!.. Where are the
all good peoples now?! - No way to Pessimism, please!.. Well, I see a
positive case here on the Swedish DN, Expressen; Maximum sentence for the
desecration of cemeteries - an outrage which traditionally targeted Jewish
cemeteries - was raised from 6 months' imprisonment to 2 years. Yes, the
prisonment period raised in 1993, Spring. Then... - It should not calls for
case; it's provocation... There is no any single case in SvekJa, means nobody
sentenced, nobody improsined for desecrations.. - Maximum sentence will be
2 years! Isn't good? - I want not talk on the sentences good or not
good... But I'm coming from Skaane and I witnessed who targeted the
cemeteries... - Who? - Jews!... I saw them... They were there
and porovoced very succesful so they manipulated sitation... Therefore there is
no prisoner after this pharagraph ' cause they aimed change the rules...
- I remember a similarly case, my mother witnessed and told us about the foxy
Jews who played theatre at the street on 30 November in Germania... It was
before WW III, Jewish fanatics crashed own glass and won enormous generous
compensation by the reasurance firms... But their media manipulated the world by
the help of american Imperialism so all the analphabets crying on every 30
September worldwide, every year like a crying festival, meantime the Zionist
boss' laughing behind the windows...
**
- This is not the Cold War but a form of ongoing Cold War, what drives now by
the lobbies... This area demands the prejudiced scientists... - Why the
oppressed folk don't protest or discuss these problems... - Ever and never!
This is not the results of the football matches... People need knowledge on
biological developments... - Biological? Bur the lobotomies and
sterilization methodes were only in last century?! - System have now most
avanced methodes for instance isolation, registration and systematically
injustice... Only two tousand youngs become suicide in SvekJa Kingdom, two times
been a short news.. - Youngs?... But adults? - They never
counts by half officially pools.... Animal lover bourgeoisie have
sex-partner-dogs, counts for identification and health rights, but not the
discriminated persons... Never mind!... - There aren't really a single
one modernized democratical institution?
- ?! ** - I wonder why many
immigrants sets to work without language courses meanwhile many others been
discriminated because of their language is not "wonderful, brilliant"?.. - I
met many people too... For example after Warszawa pakt's collapse fleed
manybiologs to the occupied Middle East, Australia, SvekJa and specially the
laboratory workers sets on the jobs without any oppression... - Did you
found any explain about this subject?.. - Not directly... I met a family
in SvekJa, who calls for BOLDTs, escaped from Baltics by the way of so-called
"official Al Capone Raoul Wallenberg" Co's false Finnish pass and corrupted
authorities in Kingdom by the way of Jewish lobbies... A cunning mature, drives
"Invandrar Publications"... She explained thatall these scientists had already
one or two international languages what beenrespected... - She lies!.. I
know a writer, know six or seven language but SvekJa system set him too the
cleaner-catch boy courses... - Yes; I understand... Jolin replied this
case too; "maybe the writer criticised the oligarchical targets..." -
And she publish these subjects on the Invandrar Tidningen? Bravo!... - You
will be chocked; she help to the lobbies to registrate opposite... - Was she
biology-worker in Baltics... - No!... But system need such families to
follow the people and therefore she didn't go to the claenar courses and nor any
language course although her vocabulary is worst when I compare with other
immigrants... Nowadays fixed this family a credit possbility by the lobbies and
Swedish American authorities,looks like a support to publish weekly propagand
bulletin, called "Sesam"... - Is it a propagand bulletin which the
redacteurs in Jew York recommended? - Yes!... Worst and most dangerous in the
world... - Do you explain; what you discovered by Sesam or chief Boldt's
although her family never had a single one scientist, fixed regularly credits...
- I am regularly reading all the issues of Sesam-falsification magazine and
seewhat this shurk's gang provoce there: "Immigrants always have problems...
Immmigrant prepared to accept thatnever been accepted as true citizen... This is
a insemination what the Zionist Fascists do against thesecond class people in
Tel Aviv... In SvekJa Kingdom, by this shurk-coup drivessame project... Look at
these pages, even the Laponians counts like the second class people and never
discuss serious their minority rights, work rights byindustrial investigations
of Kingdom... They handled often like the Gypsies,more worst; they handled like
prisoners on its own marks like the Palestinians who prisoned his own haoses
there in the occupied Middle East... Do you discussuor rights here on Immigrant
pages? Never... Boldt have credit by Spaarbank and Nordea's Jew chiefs... Why?
Because, Boldt-gang is the best flexible which uses like a condom against Human
Rights...According of these shurks there is no any Zionist Occupational Gang in
the world, but Palestinians been counted as problematics... Palestinians
describes like the immigrants there, what the oppressed people behandles here in
SvekJa Kingdom... Boldt and her lap-dogs manipulate the questions of immigrants
and never answer thequestions although there is two pages for responses... - I
know a Jewish paper in USA, redacteur send letters himself and replies later
instead of the true readers... - Similar tactic!... What Big Brother
do, Swedish hypocrites just imitate it... Not only this fetty imbecill's Sesam,
all other creit-addicted papers administrations making copies of ordinary
people's letters... mostly all these half-officially "Invandrar tidningar
industrin" "brain washing instruments on the immigrants" running on this
line... what thelobbies, so-called "registrationsnamnden" and the
collaborators by the Swedish ministries like much and therefore pumping money..
- Now I have a little question; is Boldt-gangs are Jewish originated... -
More dangereous... Members, so-called "edsvurna" by the Zionist lobbies!...But
how you guess about the origins of these shurks?! - I am not so stupid
although I like sometimes discuss football, too... - ...and maybe a private
question, too!.. How you can be so close to Jolin!... - She like small and
younger Africans like a tradition by the bourgeoisise fetties nowadays and it
was plus point when she discovered I am from Ethiopia... - More question?
- No more, 'cause I have already all the answers on this area specially
experiences by such kind of chiefs who need my massage... This is biology, too;
bio-physique... - But why all these lobbies hate Rainer Holm?.. Rainer is not
immigrant.. - He registrated because of the critics againt the system and
projects.. - What kind of system? Whose projects, whose rules? -
Kidding? - ?! **
- Different faces but same play on the dirty scenes!..
- That is right!.. Unfortunatelt, a crow goes but another crow comes...
Betrayers love eacht other and they always have supporters by the financial
lobbies... For example Sparbank, Nordea, Associates thieves Co, Citibank and
other similarly ziondominated betrayers, lean-mousetraps...
- More dangerous than all other classical mafia examples... Because all these
liberalized instruments have both legal and illegal leagues, different faces on
the different scenes...
- Flexible fascism!..
**
- Not only this case and such victims, all the anti-imperialists
are the potentially criminals, according to the registrators of lobbies...They
are suspicious in all cases, on all the connections... - They are
suspicious perhaps only on our duties... Otherways I met an interesting gay,
talks perfect Persian, practiced around of Gulf... - Dehdari? Kamali?
Tagawi? - Bijan Fahimi!.. This gay, Persian Zionist, explain any
connection between many Swedes for example: Staffan Ehnebom, Jimmie Östergren,
Ahmed Rami, Rainer Holm, Henrik Westander, Osmo Vallo (murdered by police
torture in Malmuu-city) and his prisoned brothers, Tony Deogan and Anders
Gustavsson (both murdered by group violence and prosecutors didn't accuse anyone
because tehese boys weren't from bourgeoisie cathegories in the community and
both criticized sytem by any articles before), Bengt Frejd, Olof T. Johansson,
Sara Lidman, Calle Höglund, Belay Mekkonen, Hannes Westberg, Linus Brohult, Sven
Wollter, Gunnar Thorell, Murat Yildiz, Bodil Margret Lindqvist, Staffan Beckman,
Ísmet Celepli, Juan Fonseca (when he had not so intensive interesse on money),
Ditlieb Felderer, Stefan Hjertén, Stefan Dimiter Tcholakov (forced to be psyhico
because one of the his relative was guerilla leader, who had same name forced
for Independent Makedonia and jailed by false accusations of two Jewish judges
from Bulgaria just after 1945. Guerilla leader had no possibility to defence
himself, Jewish judges published only the false accusations, including fictive
movements who leaned weapon from Germania under WW II. Although many corrupted
judges and prosecutors were the traitors, this power manipulated history; nobody
succeed to choose what is right what is wrong by medial campaigns... Guerillas,
like "Uncle Tcholakov" sentenced without any minimal evidence...This
"immigrated heimatlos Stefan" borned in 1944 as Dimiter Tcholakov, become a
brilliant academical carrier in Sofia university and fleed to SvekJa Kingdom,
completed 140 university points but prevented from work life, isolated,
discriminated by the the Jewish registrators, lobbies, specially the
collaborators of Clas Lilja "genetical-researcher Zionist clan" members in
the Waexsjö city), victims from West Front like Robert Malecki as true Vietnam
deserter and as second category; Jan Myrdal, Teddy John Frank, Frank Baude,
Peter Bratt, (his cell-shared-comrade Jan Guillou pissed off from lists because
he is a multi-milliarder rich droged creatur now), Dagmar Hagelin (Zionist
lobbies who collaborated with dictators og Soth America, followed Hagelin
relations and as a "hate case" she was been hunted in Argentina, murdered
because her father listed as Marxist), Torsten Leander (only single this one
compensed as symbolic maneouver), Work Rights Fighers Jimmie Östergren from
Högdalen and his ombudsman Bengt Pettersson from Folks house Rågsved district,
Lilian Gustavsson who is mother to Anders, 17, murdered by torture methodes of
bulldog Anders Carlsberg's fascist boys at Fyrshuset trainee center in Hammarby
bourgeoisie area of capitol and poor mother Lilian still betrays by the Jewish
manipulation center Expo's "professional liars"... and much more
anti-imperialists; I collected here hundreds of names... Count please the
victims of Estonia ferry, which used to transferring the nuclear weapons to the
West and sinked by an explosion; prosecutors hunted the criticer intellectuals
not the criminal propagandists of Jewish DN-Expressen falsificators nor the boss
of weapon markets...... Why thus people counts in two different categories and
what is difference between two oppressed or only been registrated followed
people I don't understand... But you can notice much more if you visit Veritas
Co. Veritas fraud league is a computer and distribution which serve the
falsificators, Swedes call him "Jankele Pirat kopiormästaren!", means "Bitch
falsificator masters' bastard"... - What is common with all these
plays? What is the connection but with our tennisplayer monkey? -
That is the question... They don't know anything and therefore we are on the
duty, means their unknowledge is our gain... - Game?! - You
need go to the ear specialist, my friend; Nordic climate is not fit to your
upside... - ?! **
- Please, my friend!... Take these coverages back to the archives!.. Explain
nothing there, outside;please! I'll do tanksgiving because I have only ond year
to be retired.. - Wait!.. Wait!.. My son and daughters already at AMS and
their fiancees fixed places at Länsarbetsnämnden, Migration teater's
integrationsverket.. It was difficult to be staff there, without any true exam,
nor really job interviews... We mustn't leave their situations on risk!.. - ?!
**
- I witnessed any related cases... But a woman who formated this explain she was
been guilt, instead of the suspected persons... Don't make laugh on such
stories, please!... One of these writers named Bodil Margret Lindqvist wrote a
saga/story and faced PUL when the Evangelist coup of Swedish church spioned
her... But folks insist to be solidarised with Bodil Margret Lindqvist... Dod
you know, why? Resistance against discrimination... Saga on Ulf BERG , for
instance, this saga is a strong file of Bodil's works... Saga-files are a kind
of action; yes, I should remember that Bodil Margret Lindqvist was VPK-follower
rebel... This is one of the reasons; yes, she was a famous member by Communist
Party... There are any related explains on her own homepages what she been
attacked and therefore cleaned many pages..
An example about the first story pages of Bodil Margret Lindqvist:
http://home.bip.net/mors/saga.html
Bodil's ordinary corrected (nicked A. Maria Oilworkerson) short reserv page:
http://pub.alxnet.com/guestbook?id=1034058

Short story creations like Comrade Bodil's extra diary pages:
http://pub.alxnet.com/guestbook?id=2346394 There are many
solidaríty groups around such anti-imperialist figures for example,
http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa101.html
http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa101.sign.html
Readers notices to the story teller Bodil:
http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa102.html
http://books.dreambook.com/boa100/boa102.sign.html
Bodil's close friend Comrade Jörgen "Snegroy" (second nick: Kennedy Palme)
built a support page:
http://www.javascript.nu/cgi4free/guestbook/guestbook.pl?account=snegroj3&link
- ...so far you works on Internet, it's possible that anybody try to manipulate
it.....
- That is right!.. Tere are many fanatics like Livets ord and other fascist
lkeagues who attacking the anti-imperialists. - Definitely!.. Bodil's
works been attacked by Livets ord... There are many server, like Maccabi Jewish
staff and fake Anti-Fa homepages... They still contunie to manipulate... This
is the true terror, advanced by technical support lobbies...
- Sometimes we see good friends, who show very useful solidarity for instance
Jörgen K.,; he is Bodil's close friend, struggles well. - This is the
"True Living history"... - If you have any question so I recommend
you'll call to this civil-courage symbol, "Story-teller".. Here is the directly
phone: Bodil Margret Lindqvist tel. 00.46.31.746 48 03 e-mail:
031.3310815@telia.com - 031? - Mölndal, i SvekJa
Kingdom!...
**
- Even it's not acceptable!.. My heart says; "No!.."
- What is most unfair?
- To be handled like the animals in the farm of George Orwell.. Looak at all
these swindler masters who have two-legs only difference between the other kind
of piggs...
- I understand your reactions!... But if you insist to go on the last two
leggs, riskable that you can be sanctioned.. Did you heard that many people gone
suicide? - Media didn't explain...... - Whose media? Anyway there
are many people, even an ordinary list can take many pages of newspapers...
Advertisements are important than suicide victims, nowadays... - You mean that
the system can piss off... - Legalized cleansing by modernized
methodes... Thousands of people gone suicide only in last year... -
Human? - ?! **
- David Botsford, dear; you had a radio program on this subject and ,many
listener asked "if Jan Myrdal a Nazi?
- Is Jan Myrdal a Nazi?.. Hoh how?! I remember..
- Radio talks...
- A serie... Subject was, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, DISSENTING HISTORIANS,
AND THE HOLOCAUST REVISIONISTS
- Do you explain your opinions on this subject?
- With pleasure!.. It's better we listen together a clip which connected this
matter... - Let's listen!..
- One of the ironies of our time is that just as technology makes it
ever easier to communicate ideas, the freedom to express those ideas
is being subject to continuous erosion. The world-wide spread of
electronic communications, and of the Internet in particular, is
progressively reducing the power of the state to exercise control
over the flow of information and ideas. In the years ahead we will
experience not only a dramatic increase in access to the Internet,
but also a vast extension of the range of material available on it,
which appears to be entirely outside the control of any censoring
body.[1] Arthur C. Clarke, the distinguished science-fiction writer
and inventor of the communications satellite which largely made
these developments possible, said as long ago as 1983 that:

[T]he debate about the free flow of information which has been
going on for so many years will soon be settled - by engineers,
not politicians. ... No government will be able to conceal, at
least for very long, evidence of crimes or atrocities - even from
its own people. The very existence of the myriads of new
information channels, operating in real time and across all
frontiers, will be a powerful influence for civilised behaviour.
If you are arranging a massacre, it will be useless to shoot the
cameraman who has inconveniently appeared on the scene. His
pictures will already be safe in the studio 5,000 kilometres
away; and his final image may hang you. Many governments will not
be happy about this, but in the long run everyone will
benefit.[2]

- SERIOUS ATTACK ON PRESS FREEDOM?

- Definitely!.. These insights appear to have eluded the British government. On
14th
November, 1997, Saxon Burchnall-Wood, Noel Molland and Stephen
Booth, the editors of Green Anarchist, were each sentenced to three
years' imprisonment for "inciting their readers to carry out attacks
on property and acts of violence".[3] Green Anarchist, as its name
implies, is a magazine which combines collectivist-anarchism with
environmentalism. It publishes a "Diary" section which lists
"direct-action" events worldwide, mostly without editorial comment.
These include "ecotage", a name given to such actions as the
disabling and damaging of property and machinery such as
earth-moving vehicles on the sites of new roads. The prosecution
successfully argued that by publishing such reports, the editors
were "conspiring to incite persons unknown to commit further acts of
violence".[4] Other publications cited in court as examples of
"conspiracy to incite", which have not so far been prosecuted
include Do or Die, the annual publication of Earth First. The
magazine Index on Censorship described the Green Anarchist case as
"one of the most serious attacks for many years on press freedom in
Britain".[5]

On 27th April 1998 a trial will begin at Harrow Crown Court which
promises to be an even more fundamental attack on freedom of
expression. Nick Griffin and Paul Ballard, both members of the
British National Party, are being prosecuted under the Public Order
Act 1986 for publishing material liable to incite racial hatred in
the form of certain articles appearing in their magazine The Rune.
Griffin is the editor of the magazine and Ballard the distributor.
If convicted, they face a sentence of up to two years in prison
each. The case is currently sub judice, and the press has not been
permitted to publish any details of the prosecution's case.
Nevertheless, Griffin is distributing for sale an edited version of
the police audio tape of his interview while under arrest, and the
Director of Public Prosecutions has accepted that this distribution
is lawful. I have summarised the contents of this tape in an
appendix to this paper, and will only point out here that one of the
articles for which they are being prosecuted is one denying that the
Nazis carried out a policy of extermination of Jews during the
second world war.

The criminal offence of publishing material liable to incite racial
hatred was introduced under the Race Relations Act 1965. The first
prosecution was of Michael de Freitas, a Trinidadian Black Power
advocate later known as Michael X, who was sentenced to a year's
imprisonment for advocating the killing of white men who lay hands
on black women. In virtually all cases, however, members of white
racist groups, such as the National Front, British Movement and
British National Party, have been prosecuted and fined or imprisoned
for the breach of these laws. Subsequent legislation, such as the
Race Relations Act 1976 and the Public Order Act 1986, have
drastically widened the definition of "incitement to racial hatred".
Under the latter Act a two-year prison sentence can be imposed
merely for possession of literature wherever there is an "intent or
likelihood" of inciting racial hatred. In 1997 three members of the
National Socialist organisation Combat 18 were imprisoned for
possessing material which spoke of "the myth of the Holocaust" and
outlined the aim to "execute all Jews, who have actively helped to
damage the White Race and to put into camps the rest until we find a
solution to the eternal Jew".[6] Libertarians are, of course,
totally appalled by such opinions, but would argue that putting
people into prison simply for possessing such material is a greater
evil than their possession of it (as distinct from acting in
accordance with the views expressed).

The British courts have so far ruled that historical arguments
denying the Holocaust are not a form of incitement to racial hatred
and therefore cannot be prosecuted under these laws. There was never
any indication that these laws were ever intended to apply to
arguments about history. Publications denying the Holocaust may be
lawfully imported, published and distributed without official
restriction. In 1996, Michael Howard, the Conservative Home
Secretary, negotiated an opt-out from a European Union agreement to
introduce laws to criminalise Holocaust denial. In the same year,
the Board of Deputies of British Jews called for the first time for
the introduction of such laws in Britain. Although this request was
rejected by the Conservative government, the Labour Party announced
in September 1996 that it intended to make Holocaust denial into a
criminal offence, punishable by two years' imprisonment. The Sunday
Times reported that

Jack Straw, the shadow home secretary, is expected this week to
call for the outlawing of right-wing intellectuals and political
campaigners who claim the Holocaust never happened or was unknown
to Hitler.

The right-wing historian David Irving, who argued that the
diaries of Joseph Goebbels proved Hitler was unaware of the
extermination programme against the Jews, would be among those
facing possible prosecution. by the London-based Holocaust
Educational Trust.[7]

Janice Lopatkin, spokeswoman for the trust, said:

There is a gap in the legislation because courts do not regard
Holocaust-denial material as insulting to Jews.[8]

Lord Merlyn-Rees, former Labour Home Secretary, said:

It is wrong to deny the Holocaust. It is done for anti-semitic
reasons and it should be made a criminal offence.[9]

This is the same politician who, as Home Secretary in 1977, refused
to ban the National Front march through Lewisham on the libertarian
grounds that the NF had the right to freedom of speech. That march
ended in the most ferocious street battle seen in Britain since the
1930s. If his Lordship was then so committed to the principle of
freedom of speech that he authorised the NF demonstration, and
police protection of that demonstration, despite the known risk of
violence, we are entitled to ask why he now calls for the
introduction of laws which would imprison people for two years
simply for expressing an historical opinion which differs from his
own. Between the Home Office and the House of Lords, he seems to
have taken a detour to Damascus.

A Labour Party spokesman said:

We already accept that there are limits to absolute freedom of
speech, and Holocaust denial is often used as a means of
spreading anti-semitic propaganda.[10]

At its 1996 conference, the Labour Party voted unanimously in favour
of a motion to introduce such a law. Tony Blair has made several
announcements that Jack Straw, who is now Home Secretary, is
exploring possible ways to change the law in this direction. In
1997, Mike Gapes MP (Labour, Ilford South) introduced a Holocaust
Denial Bill which failed because of the dissolution of Parliament
before the May general election. The introduction of this bill led
to considerable discussion in the media about the merits or
otherwise of the introduction of such a law. John Major, who was
then Prime Minister, Paddy Ashdown, leader of the Liberal Democrats,
and the historian Lord Russell all went on record as opposing the
introduction of such a law, as did Dr Anthony Lehrman, director of
the Institute for Jewish Policy Research. No proposals have been
heard so far since Labour took office about any legislation which
would curtail or prohibit the right to deny the Holocaust.

Nevertheless, if in the forthcoming Rune trial Griffin and Ballard
are successfully convicted of "incitement to racial hatred" simply
for making an historical argument that the Holocaust never happened,
then such a conviction would establish a very ominous precedent from
the point of view of freedom of expression. It would mean that the
distribution of any publication denying the Holocaust could suddenly
be deemed illegal and liable to prosecution, and thus be effectively
prohibited. The way in which law works in Britain would mean that
once a court had ruled that Holocaust denial per se is a form of
"incitement to racial hatred", it would mean that any person who
denies the Holocaust could receive up to two years in prison. Such a
change to the law would be the first time in which it has ever been
a criminal offence in Britain to express an opinion on an historical
subject. And this change in the law would have taken place without
any public or Parliamentary discussion of its nature and
implications.

- HOLOCAUST DENIERS ARE NOT NECESSARILY NAZIS?

- I am not a Nazi, ordinary Christian, example... But the liars label everyone
if man talks on the truth.. The purpose of the present paper is not in any way
to defend. Holocaust denial, but simply to give an accurate description of what
it is and what it is not, and to describe efforts in other countries to use the
law against it. I will then put forward an argument, based on the nature of
historical inquiry, in defence of the right
of Holocaust revisionists (as they call themselves) to express their
beliefs without civil or criminal law being brought into action
against them. No part of this paper should be interpreted as either
supporting or opposing any particular historical or other idea,
except the universal right of freedom of expression and the free
market in ideas. I am essentially adding factual information and
arguments to the position already taken, as we have seen above, by
various public figures. My concern is that a form of censorship may
come in by the back door through the Rune case which would have a
devastating effect on intellectual freedom, the concept upon which,
as Sir Karl Popper and numerous other philosophers have amply
demonstrated, all human progress ultimately depends.

It is commonly believed that Holocaust revisionism is promoted
solely by neo-Nazis, racists and anti-semites. While such
individuals have certainly taken up such ideas and promoted them
extensively, they did not initiate them. Most of the authors of
books denying that the Holocaust occurred have no connection with
such movements. Paul Rassinier was a French Socialist Party member
and pacifist academic who was arrested in 1943 and imprisoned in the
German concentration camps at Dora and Buchenwald for his
non-violent activities in the French Resistance. After the war he
was elected as a Socialist member of the Constituent Assembly,
decorated by the French government for his work in the Resistance,
and went on to write a series of books denying that the Nazis had
carried out any policy of extermination in their concentration
camps. Some Holocaust revisionists are academics, such as Professor
Arthur R. Butz, associate professor of electrical engineering and
computer science at Northwestern University, Illinois, and Dr Robert
Faurisson, formerly professor of French literature at the University
of Lyons-2, who have simply published their considered opinions
based on the research they have carried out, and are not known to
have any political affiliation or agenda. The best-known historian
who has associated himself with these arguments is David Irving,
author of numerous books about the second world war, and especially
the Third Reich. In 1977, in his book Hitler's War, Irving argued
that Hitler knew nothing about the extermination of the Jews, and he
gradually became convinced that no such exterminations at all
occurred in the concentration camps. Another is a retired German
judge, Dr Wilhelm Staglich, who claims to have been stationed at
Auschwitz during the war, and who wrote a book arguing that no
exterminations occurred there. Another is Fred A. Leuchter, an
American specialist in execution technology, who visited Auschwitz
and wrote a report stating that the building presented to visitors
at Auschwitz as a homicidal gas chamber could not have been used for
that purpose. There are Palestinian, Moroccan, Saudi Arabian, South
American and Japanese Holocaust revisionists, as well as American
blacks associated with the Nation of Islam. In France, Jean-Gabriel
Cohn-Bendit and Claude Karnoouh are both Jewish Holocaust
revisionists with left-wing political beliefs. Bezalel Chaim, of the
Revisionist Press of Brooklyn, is an American Jew who argues that
the Holocaust "myth", as he calls it, has created divisions between
Jews and Gentiles, encouraged a belligerent Zionist nationalism, and
is used to justify the Israeli oppression of the Arabs. (David Cole,
another American Jew, produced a video about Auschwitz which claimed
that no gassings occurred there, but has since recanted his views
and now accepts that the Holocaust occurred.) Extraordinary as it
may seem, the late Josef Ginsburg, a German Jew who spent the entire
second world war in Germany and Romania, and who was imprisoned in
several Nazi concentration camps, wrote several books under the
pseudonym J. G. Burg denying that any extermination of the Jews had
been carried out by the Nazis. Professor Pierre Vidal-Naquet, the
most outspoken French academic critic of the Holocaust revisionists,
states that:

In several countries ... revisionism is the speciality not of the
racist and anti-Semitic extreme right, but of several groups of
individuals coming from the extreme left. This is the case in
Sweden following the intervention on Robert Faurisson's behalf of
the extreme left-wing sociologist Jan Myrdal, whose intervention
was on behalf not merely of the man but, in part, of his ideas;
in Australia, following the action of the former secretary of the
Victorian Council for Civil Liberties, John Bennett; and even in
Italy, where a small Marxist libertarian group invokes its debt
to Paul Rassinier.[11]

Other Holocaust revisionists are American libertarians who have
associated themselves with the Institute for Historical Review
(IHR), the California-based organisation which denies that the
Holocaust occurred, as well as promoting other revisionist views
about twentieth-century history. Professor James J. Martin, the
author of numerous studies of nineteenth-century libertarianism and
anarchism, as well as revisionist studies of the two world wars and
the cold war, and who has contributed three times to the
Encyclopedia Britannica, is closely associated with the IHR. The IHR
has published one of his books, The Man Who Invented Genocide, a
biography of Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term "genocide" to
describe what the Nazis were doing to the Jews in wartime Europe.
The radical libertarian Samuel Edward Konkin III is also a supporter
of the IHR, has spoken at its conferences and provided a platform
for Holocaust revisionism in his magazine New Libertarian, although
I do not know his exact position, if any, on the Holocaust. L. A.
Rollins, the American author of the philosophical pamphlet The Myth
of Natural Rights, which has caused considerable controversy in
libertarian circles, is another Holocaust denier. It is difficult to
classify Rollins' views in terms of conventional political labels,
but he is an anti-authoritarian individualist and certainly no kind
of National Socialist or fascist.

One of the most active American Holocaust revisionists is Bradley R.
Smith, a libertarian journalist and playwright who was convicted for
selling a banned erotic novel, Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer, in
his Los Angeles bookshop in 1960-61. In 1983 his play The Man Who
Stopped Paying, dealing with tax resistance, was favourably reviewed
by the Los Angeles Times, which described it as the work of a
"libertarian-anarchist". In 1979 he first became convinced that the
Nazi extermination of the Jews never happened, as a result of
reading an article by Professor Robert Faurisson which appeared in
Le Monde. He subsequently formed the Committee for Open Debate on
the Holocaust, and has promoted Holocaust revisionism on hundreds of
radio and television talk shows, placed advertisements in college
newspapers and spoken at universities throughout the US. In an
interview with the radical American publisher Loompanics Unlimited,
Smith explained his motives for doing so:

In 1960-61 I was arrested, jailed, tried and convicted of selling
a book banned by the U.S. Government, Henry Miller's Tropic of
Cancer. At that time the best people among the progressive forces
supported my refusal to participate in censoring Miller's book in
this country. Today it's the progressive forces who work with
such dedication to suppress the Revisionist critique of the
Holocaust orthodoxy. The progressive forces will go to the wall
for sexual freedom. What they balk at is free inquiry into the
foundations of their own world view. ... I reject the
authoritarian ideal in every form, but particularly as it is
expressed by the State. ... My interest is in the ideals of free
inquiry, an open society and, if you will, my own moral being. As
a writer, how do I stand aside from the issues that I see
corrupting public discourse, and thus the lives of my friends and
neighbors? As a man, how do I stand aside from them? ... Almost
thirty years ago, the night I got the word that a bookseller on
Hollywood Boulevard was going to be arrested and prosecuted for
selling Miller's Tropic, my first reaction was to remove the book
from my store window. When I went to the window to take the book
out something caused me to pause. ... The next morning I took a
walk along the Boulevard and looked over the display windows in
the other bookshops. Tropic wasn't in any of the windows any
longer. That was good enough for me. I went back to my own shop
and climbed into the window but I couldn't bring myself to remove
the display stack. ... That same afternoon I was arrested by a
couple of L.A.'s finest in plain clothes and the stage was set
for the longest civil trial to have taken place in the city up to
that time.

It wasn't First Amendment idealism that made it impossible for me
to remove Miller's book from my window. ... It made me ashamed to
think of removing a book from my displays that I respected and
that I had gotten so much pleasure and encouragement from. ...
[W]hen the State put me to the test to declare myself publicly, I
chose my heart's desire hands down and told the State to shove it
along. ... I feel something similar for Revisionist scholarship.
While I have no love for the work, to not stand up for it now
that I know what it is would make me ashamed. That's why I can't
"just drop the subject." Hostility is easy to face when the
alternative is shame.[12]

LIBERTARIAN OPPOSITION TO AMERICAN INTERVENTIONISM

It is worth pointing out here why some libertarians and others who
have no connection with fascist or anti-semitic movements are
interested in Holocaust revisionist arguments. Although libertarians
do not agree with each other on all issues, libertarians could be
defined as believers in the value of individual freedom, property
rights, a legal and economic system which enables the voluntary
exchange of property rights in a free market, voluntary rather than
coerced cooperation between individuals and groups within society,
and the reduction of the interference of the state in the economy
and life of the people. Although these ideas go back many centuries,
the contemporary libertarian movement emerged in the United States
in the post-war period, and clearly differentiated itself from
conservatism in the 1960s. Since 1941, American foreign policy has
been based on the principle that the US government has an obligation
to intervene in the internal affairs of all countries of the world
on a massive scale in order to promote such concepts as "democracy",
"Americanism", "freedom", "anti-fascism", "anti-colonialism",
"anti-communism", "anti-terrorism", "anti-apartheidism",
"self-determination", "economic development", "the new world order",
"the war on drugs", "the survival of Israel" and several dozen other
ideas developed at places like Harvard University and the State
Department. In order to advance these concepts, young Americans,
many of them conscripts, have been sent out to kill or be killed in
various wars throughout the world, and hundreds of thousands have
lost their lives. In addition, US foreign policy has destroyed
political and economic systems, such as the European colonial
empires, which, while by no means perfect, certainly functioned far
better than the "national independence" which has followed them. The
American taxpayer has paid hundreds of billions of dollars in
"economic aid", "dev-elopment aid" and "military aid" to governments
throughout the world, and also to revolutionary movements which the
US government considers to be more "pro-Western" or "democratic"
than the government in power. It has actively attempted to re-shape
the political and economic systems of nations throughout the world,
in a process which would end, presumably, only when every corner of
the earth from Paris to the interior of Papua New Guinea is an exact
replica of Madison, Wisconsin. Perhaps the most succinct and
perceptive commentary on this policy was given by Hadj T'hami el
Glaoui, pasha of Marrakesh, in 1944:

American policy today stirs up everything and settles nothing.
The result is that it creates a void, opening the way to new
tyrannies instead of new freedoms. At the bottom of America's
attitude is the assumption that all the world wishes to be
American. And that assumption is false.[13]

Now libertarians argue that massive government intervention in the
economy and life of the United States has produced a lengthy series
of economic and social disasters. Most American libertarians would
argue that the US government is just as disastrous, if not more so,
when it intervenes in the economy and life of other countries. They
ask how American conservatives can complain about the intervention
of "big government" at home while enthusiastically supporting the
intervention of that same government in every other country on the
surface of the planet. Most American libertarians argue for a
non-interventionist foreign policy in which the US enjoys good
relations with all other countries without in any way interfering in
their internal affairs. Those individuals in other countries who
want to become Americans are free to apply at the US embassy to
emigrate there. Those who are quite happy to remain Bhutanese in
Bhutan, Bedouins in the Middle East, or whatever, should be left in
peace, and if their economic, social and political systems differ in
certain respects from those of the United States, no American should
stay awake at nights worrying about the fact.

Those American libertarians who argue in this manner are interested
in critically examining the governmental and non-governmental
propaganda which has been used to justify American global
interventionism in peace and war. They are therefore open to
historical studies which demonstrate that what governments have said
about these interventions has not always accorded with the facts.
Such historical studies, they believe, can help Americans to learn
from the past and to develop a foreign policy which is more in
accordance with the interests of the American people and of the
stability, peace and prosperity of the entire world. (And what is
true of America is also true, to a great extent, of Britain and
other Western countries.)

FIRST WORLD WAR REVISIONISM

The term "revisionism" referred originally to that school of
historical inquiry which sought to re-examine the origins of the
first world war at the end of that conflict, in the light of new
documents and interpretations which had become available. The first
revisionist work on the conflict was How Diplomats Make War (1915),
by Francis Neilson, a pacifist British MP who resigned his seat in
1914 when the British government decided on war and wrote the book
in order to expose the real origins of the conflict, as opposed to
the government's propaganda line for public consumption. After the
war, a number of American historians, beginning with Sidney B. Fay
in 1920, examined the available diplomatic papers, and in particular
the documents which had recently been published by the German,
Austrian and Soviet governments, relating to the outbreak of war in
1914. They concluded that responsibility for the war lay with
Russia, Serbia and France, and to some extent the actions of the
British foreign secretary, Sir Edward Grey, who failed to take
action to stop the drift to war, and not with Germany and
Austria-Hungary.

The revisionist history of the first world war was of more than
purely academic interest. The American intervention in that war in
1917 marked a monumental departure from the traditional American
policy of non-intervention in the quarrels of European countries,
which had been the guiding principle of US foreign policy since the
days of Washington and Jefferson. This policy was only breached when
the United States attacked Spain after the American warship the
Maine was sunk by an mysterious internal explosion in Havana harbour
in 1898. In 1917, Woodrow Wilson, rather in the manner of Pope Urban
II in 1095, preached a great crusade, not to free the Holy City of
Jerusalem from the Moslems, but to fight a war to end wars, to save
civilisation and to make the world safe for democracy. Revisionists
considered such a transformation of American foreign policy to be an
important subject for historical examination.

Also, the Treaty of Versailles (1919) had included an article which
affirmed that Germany was solely responsible for the outbreak of the
war. The Weimar government signed the treaty against enormous
domestic opposition, and only because the British navy was
maintaining a blockade of Germany that had led to the death by
starvation and disease of tens of thousands of children after the
Armistice of 1918. The treaty imposed extremely harsh measures on
this basis, including the transfer of a large proportion of German
territory and people to the rule of foreign states such as France
and Poland, and the requirement to pay vast sums of money in
financial reparations to France and Belgium. By challenging the
claim of sole German responsibility for the outbreak of war, the
revisionist historians were undermining the credibility of
Versailles and strengthening the case for revision of the entire
settlement. This case was put forward not only by Germans of all
political persuasions, but also by the Soviet Union and the
political "left" and "centre" in most Western countries. In books
such as The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1920), for example,
John Maynard Keynes exposed the economic and political dangers to
Europe of the vindictive terms of Versailles.

The historian who took the lead in addressing the Kriegsschuldfrage
was the distinguished American scholar Harry Elmer Barnes. Barnes'
magnum opus is generally considered to be the three-volume
Intellectual and Cultural History of the Western World, a landmark
in historical scholarship as well as an essential libertarian text
on account of its orientation in favour of intellectual and cultural
freedom. Before the United States entered the war, Barnes was an
outspoken advocate of intervention. When Woodrow Wilson declared war
on Germany in 1917, Barnes was recruited by the US government into
its propaganda operation, and was noted for the zeal with which he
promoted the Allied cause and denounced the Boche in that capacity.
After the war, however, he examined the documentary evidence on the
origins of the war and wrote a series of publications which argued
against German responsibility for the outbreak of that conflict. In
books such as Genesis of the World War and In Quest of Truth and
Justice, he argued that Serbia, Russia and France were primarily
responsible. In the 1920s, revisionist arguments achieved enormous
international influence, and Barnes travelled to Europe, where he
established links with European revisionists and even had an
audience with the former Kaiser. By 1930, revisionist arguments had
attained general acceptance in both Europe and the US, and had
contributed significantly to the desire of Americans to stay out of
any future foreign conflicts. Nevertheless, although the financial
reparation terms of Versailles were somewhat modified, the revision
of the territorial terms was not addressed at all. In 1930 Barnes
urged an immediate revision of Versailles in order to forestall the
rise of Adolf Hitler. He wrote:

The gains of the Hitlerites and other German nationalists
indicate that Europe cannot safely go on basing its diplomacy on
this absurd lie which never could have been solemnly maintained
except in the fog of wartime hatred which held over into
1918-1919. In 1927, von Hindenburg asked Europe in conciliatory
tones to investigate the facts of war guilt. In 1930, friends of
peace in Europe are appealing to Hindenburg to save them from
Hitler. What will be happening in 1933 if the spirit of Lloyd
George, Clemenceau, and Poincare still rules Europe?[14]

Barnes' call was ignored. Hitler came to power and began taking
vigorous steps to revise the Versailles settlement. The British and
French governments, which were later condemned for carrying out a
policy of "appeasement" of Hitler, were simply granting him what
every German government from 1919 to 1933 had asked for, and been
refused, by those same governments.

SECOND WORLD WAR REVISIONISM

With the increasing threat of war in the late 1930s, and especially
after the outbreak of the European conflict in 1939, Barnes was an
outspoken opponent of US intervention. In his nationally-syndicated
newspaper column, he alerted Americans to the danger of involvement
in the war. In 1940, heavy pressure by pro-war interest groups was
brought to bear on his employers, who dropped Barnes as a columnist
in order to avoid a ruinous advertising boycott. After the second
world war, Barnes became the leader of the historical revisionist
school relating to that conflict. He raised funds in order to
finance the research, writing and publication of books addressing
different aspects of the 1939-45 war, and assembled scholars
throughout the US and western Europe to carry out this work. In
addition, Barnes edited Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, a major
collection of revisionist essays on the Roosevelt-Truman foreign
policy, and produced a series of pamphlets critically reviewing what
he called the "court historians", those scholars who were paid vast
sums by governments and semi-official institutes to produce works
which were no more than ex post facto justifications of government
policy.

In the United States, revisionist historians, who included the
distinguished Charles A. Beard, produced studies of the diplomatic
history which led to American intervention in the war in December
1941. The Roosevelt administration had claimed that it had done
everything in its power to keep the US out of the war, until it was
subjected to a treacherous and unprovoked attacked by the Japanese
at Pearl Harbor. The revisionists argued that Roosevelt had in fact
been actively doing everything in his power to involve America in
the war from 1939, or even as early as his "quarantine the
aggressors" speech of 1937. However, he had to do so serruptitiously
because of the strong non-interventionist sentiments of the American
people. Other writers, including George Morgenstern, Admiral Robert
Theobald, John Toland and Barnes himself, argued that the Roosevelt
administration had deliberately provoked the Japanese into attacking
Pearl Harbor. They argued that the freezing of Japanese assets in
the US in July 1941 and the subsequent cutting off of oil supplies
put the Japanese into a position where they had no alternative but
to strike at the US. They claimed that the administration had known
in advance that the attack was due, as the Japanese code had been
deciphered, and had deliberately withheld that information from the
commanders at Pearl in order to ensure the maximum loss of life and
therefore be sure of obtaining a declaration of war from Congress.
Indeed, I have heard that a researcher in the US National Archives
has recently discovered a German intelligence transcript of a
wiretap of a telephone conversation between Roosevelt and Churchill
discussing the forthcoming attack on Pearl several weeks before it
actually took place.

The definitive revisionist study of the outbreak of war in Europe in
1939 was The Origins of the Second World War (1961), by the
distinguished historian A. J. P. Taylor, of Oxford University.
Taylor challenged the generally-held myth that in the 1930s Hitler
had rapidly re-armed Germany and carried out a master plan for the
conquest of Europe which would inevitably lead to war. Taylor
demonstrated that Hitler had hardly re-armed at all until 1936, and
then did so no more rapidly than other European powers. Although he
was determined to revise the terms of Versailles, he merely
responded to situations such as the Austrian and Sudeten crises of
1938 and the Polish crisis of 1939 as they arose, and acted in just
the same manner as any other great power did. He had no plan for
war, and, indeed, wanted to achieve the revision of Versailles while
avoiding it. When war broke out, it was a result of various
miscalculations by several powers during the Polish crisis, in which
Hitler was trying to recover the German city of Danzig from Poland
by negotiations. The myth of a Nazi master plan for world domination
was dead. Taylor was highly amused by the wailing and gnashing of
teeth which followed the publication of his book, which included
claims that he was some sort of Nazi apologist. An entertaining
incident is related in Adam Sisman's biography of Taylor:

When Alan flew to Munich for another televised debate ... the
taxi-driver who drove him in from the airport queried whether he
knew a certain Englishman called A. J. P. Taylor. Alan was taken
aback; he explained that he knew him well, being himself A. J. P.
Taylor. The taxi-driver stopped in mid-traffic, explained that he
had been part of Hitler's SS bodyguard, and extended a hand to
congratulate Alan for proving that Hitler had not caused the War
after all.[15]

Of course Taylor was no kind of a Nazi sympathiser. In private life
he was a socialist whose political views approximated to those of
the left wing of the Labour Party. But he kept his personal opinions
separate from his professional historical work. His approach to
history was a simple one:

There is only one profound responsibility on the historian, which
to do his best for historical truth. If he discovered things
which were catastrophic for his political beliefs he would still
put it in his books. He has no responsibility whatsoever to
fiddle the past in order to benefit some cause that he happens to
believe in.[16]

Taylor was scathing about the "court historians" who were employed
by governments and semi-official institutions. He described Between
War and Peace, by Herbert Feis, a former US State Department
employee, as "a State Department brief, translated into terms of
historical scholarship". He said that:

Dr. Feis's conclusions were not derived from the evidence; they
were assumed as self-evident before the book was begun.

Taylor concluded:

The academic historians of the West may assert their scholarly
independence even when they are employed by a government
department; but they are as much `engaged' as though they wore
the handsome uniform designed for German professors by Dr.
Goebbels.[17]

Other British revisionists, such as Emrys Hughes, David Irving and
John Charmley have produced critical studies of the policies of
Winston Churchill before and during the 1939-45 war which tend to
undermine the popular image of Churchill as a national and world
saviour. They have argued that his policies ruined Britain and its
empire, and that his behaviour did not display the heroic
characteristics presented in the mythology. For example, Irving has
demonstrated that during the Blitz, which Churchill had himself
provoked by his continuous bombing of German cities, in breach of
international agreements, Churchill knew in advance from
intelligence sources when German air raids on London were due. He
left for the countryside on those dates, only to return later and
tour the bomb sites for the benefit of the newsreels and press
photographers.

In the 1960s, several American "new left" revisionist historians,
such as William Appleman Williams and Gabriel Kolko, produced
studies arguing that US foreign policy during the second world war
aimed at extending the economic, military and political power of the
United States over the world, at the expense of other powers, and
was not the altruistic "crusade for democracy" of wartime
propaganda. The work of these historians was a milestone in the
development of 1939-45 revisionism, in that criticism of the
Roosevelt administration's wartime foreign policy had hitherto been
something of a taboo subject among American scholars of the
political "left" and "centre".

The background to the outbreak of war between Germany and the Soviet
Union in June 1941 has also been the subject of revisionist inquiry.
Professor Ernst Topich, an Austrian philosopher, and Victor Suvorov,
a Soviet defector who had access to first-hand Soviet material, have
both written books arguing that Stalin was massing colossal military
forces on his western borders in the spring of 1941 in preparation
for an invasion of Germany in the summer of that year. Topich and
Suvorov argue that Hitler's Operation Barbarossa aimed to pre-empt
this threat before it was too late, and was not the culmination of
any long-term plan.

Other revisionist studies critically examined the "unconditional
surrender" doctrine upon which Roosevelt insisted from January 1943,
which, it is argued, undermined the position of the anti-Hitler
plotters in Germany, extended the war's duration, death toll and
destructiveness, and eliminated Germany and Japan as bulwarks
against the expansion of Soviet and Chinese communism. Vast
Anglo-American material assistance was handed over to the Soviet
Union without any conditions relating to the future of the eastern
European nations, which ended up under Soviet rule for over 40
years.

Revisionist scholarship has also examined Allied atrocities. During
the war, some 500,000 to 1 million Soviet citizens fought as part of
the Wehrmacht and its auxiliaries, and toward the end of the war a
Russian Liberation Army was set up under General Vlasov, who had
been captured by the Germans in 1942. Other Soviet citizens went
over to the Germans as forced or volunteer labourers and prisoners
of war. After the war, the British and US authorities forcibly
repatriated some two to three million Soviet and Yugoslav citizens
who had surrendered to the British and Americans in return for
guarantees that they would not be sent back. These people were then
either murdered by the NKVD or Tito's communists, or sent to the
slower death of the Gulag archipelago.

F. J. P. Veale, A. J. P. Taylor and others have demonstrated
conclusively that Britain, and not Germany, initiated the aerial
bombing of civilians in 1940, in breach of binding international
agreements and centuries of European practice. The Lindemann Plan,
which was formally adopted by the Churchill government in 1942,
called for the deliberate saturation bombing of German civilians,
and led to wholesale massacres in German cities. Martin Caidan has
demonstrated that the ten-day British raid on Hamburg in 1943 killed
a total of 60,000-100,000 civilians. David Irving has estimated that
in 1945 the RAF and US Air Force killed some 70,000-90,000
civilians, mainly refugees, in the raid on Dresden, a city with no
military value, war industries, or anti-aircraft defences.
Altogether, over 400,000 German civilians were killed by bombing.
For every British civilian killed by German bombing, nine Germans
died from Anglo-American raids, and for every ton of German bombs
dropped on Britain, 315 tons of British and US bombs were dropped on
Germany.18 Once American bombers were within range of the Japanese
home islands in 1945, the US carried out the saturation bombing of
Japanese cities. The attack on Tokyo was the largest air raid in
history, and pilots reported the smell of burning flesh two miles
above the blazing city. The only unusual feature of the raids on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki was that they were carried out with a single
bomb in each case. Gar Alperovitz, among others, has demonstrated
that the Japanese had been trying to surrender since January 1945.
The atomic bombing of those cities in August was the result of
internal US politics and inter-service rivalries, and completely
unnecessary from a military point of view.

Other Allied atrocities which have been studied by revisionists
include the Soviet massacre of 23,000 Polish prisoners of war at
Katyn in 1940, and the mass killing, rape, looting and destruction
which the Soviet Army carried out in its advance across Germany and
Hungary in 1944-45, including the deliberate sinking of German
hospital ships which were transferring refugees to the west. Such
atrocities continued long after the final German surrender, and were
deliberately incited by Soviet propaganda. The treatment of German
prisoners of war in Soviet captivity was so bad that only a handful
of them returned home alive, some as late as 1955. Other studies
have examined the forced expulsion of some 15 million German
civilians from their homes in the eastern provinces of Germany which
were ceded to Poland, Czechoslovakia and the Soviet Union at the end
of the war. Somewhere between one and two million are estimated to
have died from hunger, exposure, and murder in the long march to the
rump of western Germany.

Revisionists such as the Italian historian Luigi Villari have
revealed that the Anglo-American invasions of western Europe in
1943-5 were far from the wonderful process of "liberation" displayed
in Hollywood films. In 1944, for example, a division of Moroccan
troops under the command of General Juin, of the Free French Army,
went on the rampage in the Italian countryside between Naples and
Rome. They raped 2,000 to 3,000 females aged from 11 to 86, as well
as some men, murdered 100 of the women and 800 men who tried to
protect them, destroyed 81% of dwellings and farm buildings, stole
90% of the farm animals and took virtually every valuable belonging
to the villagers.19 During the Allied "liberation" of Italy, the
American authorities closely co-operated with vicious Mafia killers
such as "Lucky" Luciano, who re-established the Mafia's death-grip
over Italy, which had been successfully destroyed by Mussolini in
the 1920s. In "liberated" Italy and France, armed communist death
squads roamed the country and murdered, with or without a show
trial, anybody they classed as a "collaborator", which included
anyone known to hold anti-communist opinions.

Revisionists have argued that the wartime German shootings of
civilians in occupied countries, harsh though they certainly were,
were a response to partisan warfare carried out by individuals
fighting in civilian clothes who carried out killings of German
soldiers and then blended back into the civilian population. This
form of warfare was expressly prohibited under the Geneva
Convention, which provided for a strict division between combatants
and non-combatants. The communists, in particular, engaged in such
warfare in order to provoke German retaliation against the civilian
population, and thus increase hatred against the Germans, which
would bring more recruits for the "resistance" movements. The
distinguished British military historian and tank warfare expert
Major General J. F. C. Fuller describes how the Soviet partisans
operated:

[T]he partisans were instructed to kidnap German soldiers, torture
them to death, and expose their mutilated bodies in places which
would incriminate the local inhabitants. German reprisals followed;
villages were burnt, hostages shot, cattle removed, and sometimes
entire districts in which partisans operated were devastated. The
results of reprisals were negligible, because all that the partisans
had to do was to move into another district and repeat their
devilry. But for the Germans they were disastrous. The peasants,
deprived of means of living and filled with intense hatred for those
[the Germans] whom they had welcomed as liberators [when they first
arrived in the Soviet Union], joined the partisans in tens of
thousands.[20]

Similar events happened throughout German-occupied Europe. When the
killing of their soldiers occurred, the Germans announced that any
further partisan actions would be dealt with by shooting ten
civilians for every German soldier killed. These threats were
carried out when partisan warfare continued in spite of the
warnings. The German response, ruthless though it certainly was, was
nevertheless carried out in accordance with international law and
the military manuals of all major countries. Exactly the same
methods were used after the war by the British in Malaya and Kenya,
the French in Indochina and Algeria, and the Americans in Vietnam.

The Anglo-American-French post-war occupation of western Germany was
inspired by the Morgenthau Plan, which called for the destruction of
Germany's industrial capacity and its reduction to an agricultural
economy with a greatly reduced population. Numerous accounts from
the immediate post-war period testified to the appalling conditions
of starvation and disease which had been imposed on the German
people through the post-war destruction of factories, mines and
other economic resources, as well as the deliberate withholding of
food supplies. Prisoners of war were illegally used as slave
labourers after the war, often in extremely bad conditions, or
deliberately left to die of starvation, disease and exposure in
prison camps without shelter. One can only imagine what conditions
were like in the Soviet zone. Only in 1948, with the growing Soviet
threat, did the Western occupiers begin to reverse the Morgenthau
Plan and replace it with a policy of German reconstruction. In his
recent book Crimes and Mercies, the Canadian journalist James Bacque
has claimed that, overall, as many as nine million Germans died
premature deaths as a result of Soviet and Western Allied occupation
policies from 1944 to 1950, but this is considered an overestimate.

The Nuremberg Trials, and other prosecutions of German and Japanese
leaders for war crimes, have also been the subject of revisionist
scholarship, especially in Advance to Barbarism, by the British
lawyer F. J. P. Veale. Revisionists have criticised what happened
when the Allied powers created a "court" with "laws" and "crimes"
invented for the occasion, in which judges and prosecutors both
represented the Allied powers, in which technical rules of evidence
did not apply, in which generals, admirals and diplomats were
imprisoned or even hanged simply for performing their normal duties,
in which sentences were announced in advance, and in which no Allied
official was ever charged with any war crime. Revisionists contend
that there was not a single crime proven at Nuremberg, such as the
use of slave labour, which the Allied powers had not also committed.
For example, Admiral Raeder received a life sentence for the
invasion of Norway in 1940, which, as the official British history
of the war has stated, was precisely what the British were preparing
to do before the Germans successfully pre-empted them.
Colonel-General Jodl was hanged primarily for being the most popular
and respected of the German generals. Joachim von Ribbentrop was
hanged for "plotting aggressive war" on evidence which could have
convicted the foreign minister of any major power. Field Marshal
Keitel was hanged for taking reprisals against civilians on the
Eastern Front of exactly the sort which, as we saw above, the
British, French and Americans carried out in various post-1945
conflicts. Rudolf Hess, who had tried to end the war with his flight
to Britain in 1941, received a life sentence (and supposedly
"committed suicide" under mysterious circumstances in 1987 after
Mikhail Gorbachev had agreed to release him). A. J. P. Taylor said
of the Nuremberg Trials that they were a "macabre farce" and that
"there are few episodes of modern history more nauseating".21 He
might have said the same about the trials of Japanese leaders at the
Tokyo and Manila war crimes trials, which were run on similar
principles. The Nuremberg Trials were denounced by numerous public
figures throughout the Western world. For example, in his book
Profiles in Courage, John F. Kennedy, later President of the United
States, praised Senator Robert A. Taft for his public denunciation
of the Nuremberg Trials while they were going on, and argued that
Nuremberg represented the Soviet idea of trials as an instrument of
government policy rather than of Western ideals of justice.

From a libertarian perspective, revisionists have also demonstrated
the drastic extension of the power of the state at the expense of
individual liberty which occurred in consequence of the second world
war. For instance, peacetime conscription was introduced for the
first time in Britain in 1939 and the US in 1940, and was continued
after the war. In Britain, fascists, suspected German sympathisers
and other opponents of the war, including Admiral Sir Barry Domvile,
formerly director of Naval Intelligence, Captain A. H. M. Ramsay MP,
and Sir Oswald and Lady Diana Mosley, were imprisoned without charge
or trial under Regulation 18B in 1940, in breach of the provisions
of Magna Carta. The Communist Party papers Daily Worker and The Week
w