Due to spam and off-topic content, these forums are being phased out and replaced with new great books forums. Please join us!

Posted by Pole on November 11, 19104 at 13:27:08:

In Reply to: Re: Who am I? posted by krazho on November 10, 19104 at 20:36:32:

: : from eldras:

: : The question cannot be answered empirically.

: : Philosophy knows no certification.

: : Ta Salutant!

: : ELDRAS
: ....................................

: : I see what you mean. I'm answering to Krazho the difficulty of the empirical Ego in Kant. He shouldn't be so low minded/minding of the human conscience for the ESSENCE "I am". People have many situations.

: Here I am in the midst of the world was a view Kant could contest in pure reason. However, in judgment it was the practical reality of the essence. Judgments are made independently of the others' comments. Kant in many ways is unaware of the wealth of goodness he justifies in the rational capacities of mutually contained thinking. Practically, though, we work alone for the cause and that would mean we can only each depend on ourselves.

: Kant was the common courage in practice. because he as all the others is and was the universal unique self.

: stop the presses I cry; the universal ego is vulnerable to the address of empiricism lieing or even worse making up truths about the ego in specific actions.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup