:
Posted by dwight on August 05, 1998 at 05:51:38:
In Reply to: Re: Only the poets can save us posted by cordelia on August 05, 1998 at 02:24:23:
Uncanny, that you can use and utilize so many
(and some $20) words of the english language,
and not make a single poigniant idea, thought,
statement, or even insult!
But, you make my life so fun because now I am
obliged to ridicule, embar, and point out
how dangerous, and deadly it is to work for
the agency... or party, rather.
: You are a quick one.
Quick. Uh... thanks(?)
Yes, Clinton is a fabulist-in-the-making,
: an altogether fatuous man who reads statements off of tele-prompters,
: sends his best friends to serve time and enjoys gratis in
: the back seat of limousines with little girls and prostitutes. He is
: A Politician.
Mmmm. Maybe I'm not familiar with the heiarchy of
bastard governments. So is a spook a higher level
of caste than a politician? How about a spook et?
What about a 33rd level member skull and bones
lodge member? Please familiarize me with this
precious wheel of samsara, this pyramidal oligarchy, so
that I can best understand precisely where it is
your coming from. If the president is a stool
pigion, then hand me the smelling salt that might
awaken me from my 'morphine delirium'(?) and tell
me precisely who is calling the shots.
: Perhaps in your morphine delirium of a 'better society,' you have
: forgotten that the universe does not conform to what
: you-think-the-universe-should-be.
Really? I think it does. Please elaborate.
: This brand of normative ethics is a tired field that has already had
: its day from early Wittgensteinian fools and other self-aggrandising
: scheisters who must resort to an argument ad testimonial to sound
: somewhat plausible.
Dear Bloke, "an argument" is the holy grail
compared to the blither you put forth. Limp 1984
referenced insults are too good for you regarding
the words you come at me with. You have addressed
none of the questions put to you in any reasonable
fasion. Not only have you done nothing to discredit
my thoughts, you have also not come close to
defending yours. I could take the time to break
down each sentance (of yours) and point this out
to you, but you would simply ignore it anyway.
(Or take it to the lab, to be yzed and drycleaned!)
: You are an indignant little boy who has just discovered that the world
: is not flat.
Who's world are you referring to? And how do you
know if I'm a man woman boy girl baby or other?
Do you wish for me to divuldge secrets over a puny
little insult such as this?
Fool! Your incompetance brightens my day.
Have a happy eternity, pitmaster.
D
: : BRAVO!!
: : You have *mastered* Newspeak!!! Please send me the
: : 18th edition dictionary when you get a chance!
: : In true party fasion, you have successfuly
: : eluded any factual intelligent dialogue. Comrade,
: : you shall be issued an extra ration of victory
: : gin for your fine service!
: : Because it gives me great pleasure to point out
: : party fallabilities, I will humor a retort, and
: : give you a chance to stoop to my level so you can
: : enlighten us unfortunates.
: : : It seems I have put strong wine into the mouth of a babe, and
: : : he does not like its bitter taste.
: : I much prefer milk, thank you.
: : : Excuse me, I was under the impression that you have read '1984' and
: : : was familiar with its principle mechanics.
: : I have read 1984, and am probably more qualified to
: : understand it's meaning more than anyone. I'm not
: : certain if a book can possess mechanics, or what
: : mechanics have to do with reading a book.
: :
: : Your typical splenetic duh-duh
: : : response could only come from a truly 'Americanised' mind and reveals
: : : that you are a loyal prole engaged in The Government-supported activity of
: : : 'Hate Week.'
: : Now this is a flavourful insult! What, pray tell, is
: : a duh-duh response? Is that similar to a doo-doo,
: : or a doy-doy, or a ding-ding response? It might be
: : helpful if you tell me exactly what language you are
: : speaking so that I might be able to know what the
: : hell you're talking about. My guess is duh-duh is
: : a brand new newspeak word. You must ship the new
: : edition soon before I make a major faux paugh in
: : front of a party member!
: : Now the accusation that my mind is Americanized...
: : that truly, truly hurts. But, I understand that this
: : is a popular newspeak tactic. (When accused of
: : murder, call the accuser a murderer) Just like
: : Clinton, at a posh fundraiser this weekend; when
: : asked about the swamp of controversy he's s(t)inking
: : in replied by saying the people investigating him
: : have been lying, subordening purgery, leaking to the
: : press, etc. I understand why you are still at the
: : University, because when you graduate, you will
: : have learned that this is an effective tactic when
: : dealing with large numbers of proles, but becomes
: : less efficient when dealing one on one conversations.
: : That being said, I will give you an opportunity to
: : show and tell me how my thoughts and words reek of
: : amerikkkanization, and that I'm a mindless prole
: : engaging in hate week. My guess is that you will
: : dole out more newspeak insult attempts, or ignore
: : me altogether, but I like giving people chances. It
: : makes things fun, you see.
: : : As for your questions, I am merely stultified by the rare brillance of locution
: : : that you seem to possess in abundance.
: : Why, if that is a complement, I accept! Thanks.
: : But I am not playing fair. One cannot explain
: : : a world of six-dimensional colour to a dog that sees in two-dimensional black-and-white.
: : : It appears that you are of the latter and not the former, as your perception is limited
: : : to a 'cause/effect' argument reduced on a linear scale.
: : Wait!! Wait a minute. My questions stultify you, but
: : I'm a linear thinking doG?? What, then, would that
: : make you??? Comrade, you have effectively insulted
: : yourself!!
: : What part of my argument dealves in
: : cause/effect relationships? By this, do you mean
: : beCAUSE the CIA spies on everyone, is the world
: : largest drug dealer, and inates poets, prophets,
: : peace activists and all threats to the agency (including
: : people who work for them) the EFFECT will be
: : mive destruction on a global scale? Is that what
: : you mean? Hmmm... maybe you're right. Please advise
: : me on how to expand my mind in a more cirnavigational
: : manner, such as yours. I need help, obviously, please
: : enlighten me.
: : : But the most interesting thing you ask is 'Who are the poets?' Perhaps you should begin with
: : : 'What is a poet?' then move onto the more brain-stimulating questions.
: : Doubleplusgood Doublespeak duckspeak at true
: : perfection comrade!!
: : You are the one who stated the poets will save us. I
: : was "attempting" to get an explanation regardin these
: : mystery poets who will jump out of the blue and save
: : us from BB's eminant cataclysm. Apparently, this
: : was a hollow statement, or I'm talking to a CIA
: : agent, rather than the one who actually posted this
: : statement originally...
: : : (Hint: the answer is not in the dictionary)
: : :
: : Ah, true. most of the difficult answers are not. Nor
: : are they in the CIA 'How to , Murder, and
: : Supress Democracy' manual.
: : G'day,
: : Comrade