|
|
Due to spam and off-topic content, these forums are being phased out and replaced with new great books forums. Please join us!
Posted by Pjk on August 18, 19100 at 01:17:14:
In Reply to: Sorry, L.Swilley, I plead my hasty, unelaborated thinking will be forgiven.... posted by Still Not J on August 17, 19100 at 09:14:11:
I should prolly make this a separate topic but I
disagree with whomever said that the wound is symbolic of
unrealized freedom. (Was it Wilson of "Not-J?) Anyway, I
think it is at the end of a book about The Sun Also Rises
that Mike Reynolds makes the point that when Brett says
"We could have had such a wonderful time together," and
Jake says, "Wouldn't it be nice to think so," they mean that
there is no way they *could* have been together. But to think that
it is becasue of the wound is to miss the point. They could not
have been together - formed a commitment one to the other -
becasue in the post-war years commitments to anything were dead;
commitments to forms of authority (the church, the state) or to one
another. The war killed commitment. This is why the characters are
presented as aimless and drinking heavily and, outside of Jake and
Georgette (the prostitute) none of them appear to have s. Why have a
if the future has been shown to be so uncertain? They are a lost generation
in several senses; lost in the sense that they don't know where they are nor
where they are going. But lost in the sense that they have lost faith in the
pre-war institutions that used to support people. See, if you can, a small
book entitled Hemingway and the Post-narrative Condition. A narrative for the
essayist is something that is pasted on from one generation to another and which
sustains them - laws, commandments, traditions. The Sun Also Rises describes a
post-narrative condition.
As to Paris ("We'll always have Paris," Rick says to Ilsa). If there is anything to the
above, then certainly Paris is cannot be temporally ambiguous. It cannot be the Paris
of 11 years earlier, 1914 say, and you can see why in terms of at least half of the characters.
And, I think, it cannot be 11 years later when, historically, the post-war era was over and
the pre-war era had just begun. And The Sun Also Rises is definately a post-war novel.
And geographically and discriptively, "Why does The Sun Also Rises continue to intrigue
readers?" "The answer to this question resides in Hemingway's extraordinary ability to
create the ambiance of a special time and place. When Jake walks down the Boulevard to the
rue Souffet for coffee and brioche, we walk with him and agree that it is a fine morning.
If we have been to Paris, then the flower women coming up from the market, the students on their
way to the Sorbonne, the buses on the boulevards all RING TRUE. If we have not been to paris,
of course we want to go there even before reading the novel. Everyone wants to go to Paris. Jake's
ambles along the boulevards serve to increase our appitite, and we walk with him past the men with
jumping frogs and toy boxers, and with him we follow the man puching a roller that printed the name
CINZANO on the sde walk in damp letters." (Mike Reynolds)
My contention is that if Hemingway did not describe a realistic Paris
would his description of the disaffection of his characters be more or less
realistic? Does he establish himself as an expert on some things so as to
make the reader believe he is expert on all things? Could Jake and Brett
have ambled down a made-up or unnamed boulevard? IMO, no.
hth
Pjk