|
|
Due to spam and off-topic content, these forums are being phased out and replaced with new great books forums. Please join us!
Posted by Spotcheck on August 28, 19100 at 06:35:17:
In Reply to: I still don't. posted by Chatterbox on August 27, 19100 at 12:55:53:
Please go to the post entitled I understand! - Mistake and Correction!
: : What do sentient human being have to do with it?
: : Nature seeks complexity because complexity imparts a greater probablility of survivability.
Nonsense. Complexity has nothing to do with survivability. The amoeba has survived far longer than we have, and the first amoeba can be said - in a real sense - to be here in person.
: This explains why we're here discussion evolution theory or intelligent design as the case may be.
: No, it doesn't. You are confusing intelligence with survivability. The amoeba has been around for hundreds of millions of years. Humans have been around for about 100,000.
: : Alright!
: Well, get on with it! How do the latent genes remain unchanged, so that they can be expressed at some point in the future? How is it that they are not subject to mutation?
For someone that claimed he was about to make Darwinism obselete, you are suddenly curiously reticent.
It's a tough case to beat as you well know. The only way to beat it is to hypothesize an intelligent designer.