Re: appendix 2: Astronomy Campfire
If ye would like to moderate the Astronomy Campfire, please drop becket@jollyroger.com a
line. Astronomy & Re: appendix 2
Posted by Astroman on October 08, 192002 at 13:55:22:
In Reply to: appendix 2 posted by pete s on October 06, 192002 at 05:22:46:
>Even more surprised the next evening when I looked again and they were gone. Nowhere on any page. How does this happen. Does the system operator at google get a screech down the phone "Hey this is subversive stuff take it down"?
Watch out. Your paranoia is showing. I've seen this kind of thing all the time. Search engines are not set in stone, as the internet fluctuates constantly.
>I an just a person trying to get an answer to a scientific possibility that has bugged me for some years.
I thought I answered you. It's a neat idea, but wholly impossible, according to the laws of physics as we know them today. If you can come up with some concrete proof, or even a reasonable experimental result that can be duplicated, maybe it will be considered. Until then, ...
>Of course I see that grb research employs hundreds worldwide but science does bring new directions sometime they have to adjust.
As I said, some verifiable data would be good. Suitable adjustments to follow.
>So dear reader, browser, surfer or whatever read the foregoing chat and note that someone has done me the honour of indicating it is more than the usual crackpot stuff.
Who? I wouldn't say "crackpot", more like "unlikely in the extreme", or "improbable", or "faulty physics". I've attempted to set you straight, but you insist on ignoring the laws of physics. I suspect you did the indicaing yourself.